Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 BRIAN SARRATT v. NJ PLIGA -- rank: 1000

... 6-62 and to comply with the notice provisions of N.J.S.A. 39:6-65. We affirm. Plaintiff was riding a bicycle in Elizabeth on ... on plaintiff's behalf within the 180 days permitted by N.J.S.A. 39:6-65.1 Counsel for PLIGA wrote to plaintiff's counsel on ... of Medicare Eligibility; and • Application for PIP benefits. 1 N.J.S.A. 39:6-65 provides in pertinent part: Any qualified person . . . who suffers damages ... complaint for failure to comply with the notice provisions of N.J.S.A. 39:6-65. 2 Plaintiff also testified at his deposition that he'd ... tendered well beyond the 180-day limit for notice under N.J.S.A. 39:6-65. Plaintiff countered that he had provided all required information, and ... provide that '[a] Notice of Intention to Make Claim under N.J.S.A. 39:6-65 may be filed on [the form designated]' by the ...

docket:	a0786-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-01-08
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25540

2 ALICIA MENA & ET ALS VS UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND & ET ALS -- rank: 866

... untimely filed beyond the ninety-day limitation period prescribed by N.J.S.A. 39:6-65.     On March 1, 1994, Alicia, individually, and as guardian ad ... when neither plaintiff fully complied with the notice provisions within N.J.S.A. 39:6-65. See footnote 14 Although defendant raised this argument before the ... Court discussed the purpose of the notice provisions delineated in N.J.S.A. 39:6-65:             The time requirements for the notice of claim are designed ... deemed to have equitably complied with the notice provisions of N.J.S.A. 39:6-65.     Affirmed. Footnote: 1 On the date scheduled for this non ... to be brought in by amendment.         [Emphasis added.] Footnote: 14 N.J.S.A. 39:6-65 provides in pertinent part:         Any qualified person . . . who suffers damages ...

docket:	a2174-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-12-30
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	43878

3 Jimenez v. Baglieri -- rank: 746

... intent to make a claim within the time permitted by N.J.S.A. 39:6-65, (b) the injuries are not covered by workers' compensation laws ...

docket:	a-25-97
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1998-01-29
status:
citation:	152 N.J. 337
Document Size:	38166

4 Shaw v. City of Jersey City -- rank: 578

... Fund must be filed “within 90 days after the accident.” N.J.S.A. 39:6-65. The Fund’s substantive provision does not refer to “accident ...

docket:	a-101-01
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2002-12-11
status:
citation:	174 N.J. 567
Document Size:	50173

5 MARK S. SHAW v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, et al., on behalf of the UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD -- rank: 571

... use of a motor vehicle in this State," may qualify. N.J.S.A. 39:6-65.     The word "accident," which appears by way of limitation in ...

docket:	a6669-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2002-01-03
status:	published
citation:	346 N.J. Super. 219
Document Size:	27412

6 RUSSELL WYCHE v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 527

... vehicle purposes. He lodged a timely claim with the Fund. N.J.S.A. 39:6-65.     Plaintiff brought suit and on May 21, 2004 the case ...

docket:	A2835-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-03-08
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	17633

7 RUSSELL WYCHE v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 527

... vehicle purposes. He lodged a timely claim with the Fund. N.J.S.A. 39:6-65.     Plaintiff brought suit and on May 21, 2004 the case ...

docket:	A2738-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-03-08
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	17634

8 ERACLIO CERNA v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM & JUDGMENT BOARD -- rank: 520

... a)]. [2] The plaintiff has complied with the provisions of N.J.S.A. 39:6-65. [3] The plaintiff is not a person covered with respect ...

docket:	a4661-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2002-08-22
status:
citation:
Document Size:	76258

9 STEPHANIE VILLANUEVA v. AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 465

... with the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6-65, the plaintiff would "still enjoy satisfaction of his claim at ...

docket:	A3214-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-01-04
status:	published
citation:	374 N.J. Super. 283 864 A.2d 428
Document Size:	22752