Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Jimenez v. Baglieri -- rank: 1000

... claimants must comply with numerous procedural requirements. See, e.g. , N.J.S.A. 39:6-70, and for those injured in hit-and-run accidents, N ... on behalf of an insurer under the circumstances prohibited by N.J.S.A. 39:6-70 for accidents involving known uninsured automobiles are similar to the ... execute on that judgment before seeking payment from the Fund. N.J.S.A. 39:6-70(h)-(k). Because the victim of a known uninsured driver ... of claimants to collect from the Fund set forth in N.J.S.A. 39:6-70 and -78. In those sections only section 70(n) "does ... the Law Division held that the guest exclusion clause of N.J.S.A. 39:6-70 was applicable to hit-and-run accidents, even though that ...

docket:	a-25-97
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1998-01-29
status:
citation:	152 N.J. 337
Document Size:	38166

2 ALICIA MENA & ET ALS VS UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND & ET ALS -- rank: 814

... 12 II     At trial, and again on appeal, UCJF, citing N.J.S.A. 39:6-70, contends that plaintiffs were not entitled to recover PIP benefits ... motor vehicle operated by an uninsured driver. UCJF relied upon N.J.S.A. 39:6-70 entitled "Hearing on application for payment of judgment," which provides ... plaintiffs' amended complaint for PIP benefits payable from the fund. N.J.S.A. 39:6-70 pertains to the eligibility of a claimant seeking to satisfy ... provisions of sub-sections (a), (c), (d), or (l) of N.J.S.A. 39:6-70. Those disqualifications correspond to the specific disqualifications of the 1972 ... which referred PIP exclusions back to specifically enumerated subsections of N.J.S.A. 39:6-70, one of those subsections, (d), was likewise amended. The amended ... of the uninsured motorist against whom the claim was made? N.J.S.A. 39:6-70." Aydee answered, "No." These questions did not appear on ...

docket:	a2174-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-12-30
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	43878

3 HERBERT BASHIR VS COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE & ET ALS -- rank: 631

... by any workmen's compensation law” within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 39:6-70(a).         [ Licata , supra , 48 N.J. at 258 (citations omitted ... covered” by any workers' compensation law ”within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 39:6-70(a).” See id.     We recognize that the literal words of ... both laws are best served by a narrow reading of N.J.S.A. 39:6-70(a), and therefore hold that plaintiff's Article 7A right ...

docket:	a5305-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-06-16
status:	published
citation:	313 N.J.Super. 1
Document Size:	18477

4 BRIAN SARRATT v. NJ PLIGA -- rank: 618

... on behalf of an insurer under the circumstances prohibited by N.J.S.A. 39:6-70(l). [ 152 N.J. at 343.] A-0786-22 11 ...

docket:	a0786-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-01-08
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25540

5 SHADAWN SUMNER V. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGEMENT FUND ET AL -- rank: 603

... been entitled to recover payment from the Fund pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6-70(n).      Plaintiff acknowledges that in 1988, N.J.S.A ... threshold requirement N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8 and N.J.S.A. 39:6-70 have parallel legislative histories, the provisions address discrete factual scenarios ... A. 39:6A-8 applies to suits against insured tortfeasors; N.J.S.A. 39:6-70 applies to the payment from the fund of judgments rendered ...

docket:	a1249-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-03-15
status:	published published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	19204

6 Tyrell Hardy v. Humza Abdul-Matin, et al., and Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. -- rank: 597

... J.S.A. 39:6A-7(b)(2) differently from N.J.S.A. 39:6-70(c)(2), since both statutes were remedial in nature and ... the Appellate Division addressed the meaning of the exclusion in N.J.S.A. 39:6-70(c), which provides that the applicant shall be required to ... J. Super. 243 , 246-48 (App. Div. 1997), which interpreted N.J.S.A. 39:6-70(c), an analogous provision of the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment ...

docket:	a-112-07
court:
decided:	2009-03-05
status:
citation:	198 N.J. 95
Document Size:	55852

7 YVETTE M. CARMICHAEL & GERALD CARMICHAEL, ET AL -- rank: 557

... for payment under the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund (Fund), N.J.S.A. 39:6-70.      557 A.2d 661. "Without the intent to operate and ...

docket:	a4953-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-03-17
status:	published
citation:	310 N.J.Super. 34
Document Size:	25704

8 HERIBERTO CABALLERO-GONZALEZ v. HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 487

... uninsured motor vehicle.' Foxworth, 134 N.J. at 285 (quoting N.J.S.A. 39:6- 70(d)); Caldwell, 232 N.J. Super. at 408 (quoting N ...

docket:	a0875-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-12-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	64590

9 JANNA IRVING v. KEILAMARA C. OLIVEIRA -- rank: 472

... UCJF/PLIGA to make payment up to the statutory limits. N.J.S.A. 39:6-70, including meeting the lawsuit threshold set forth in 152 N ...

docket:	a4663-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-04-08
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	31767

10 ERACLIO CERNA v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM & JUDGMENT BOARD -- rank: 463

... on behalf of an insurer under circumstances set forth in N.J.S.A. 39:6-70. [8] This action is not barred by N.J.S ...

docket:	a4661-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2002-08-22
status:
citation:
Document Size:	76258

11 GISELE LIGHTNER v. TOMAS SOLIS, -- rank: 402

... for payment under the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund (Fund), N.J.S.A. 39:6-70. Subsection (d) requires that in order for an injured person ...

docket:	A3156-01
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2003-04-15
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	26916

12 JESUS SANTOS v. JAVIER HERNANDEZ -- rank: 371

... recovered by the plaintiff as specified in subparagraph (m)" of N.J.S.A. 39:6-70. That subsection, in turn, refers to "any other person against ...

docket:	a1286-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-03-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27600

13 TAMIKA HALL VS LEGIOUS MINDER & UNSATISFIED CLAIM & JUDGMENT FUND & PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO & DEBORAH LOWENSTEIN -- rank: 289

... regarding ownership of a vehicle is not a consideration under N.J.S.A. 39:6-70(c)(2)." Id. at 514 n.2. We disagree.     Our ...

docket:	a3859-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-03-05
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	10224