Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF DELAWARE v. 4M INTERPRISE, INC -- rank: 1000

... needed to carry out its responsibilities" under several statutes, including N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1 (which covers specified uninsured claims, including pedestrian-PIP claims that ...

docket:	a3490-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-06
status:	published
citation:	431 N.J.Super. 514 70 A.3d 757
Document Size:	42904

2 OMAR SANDERS v. NORMA K. LANGEMEIER -- rank: 918

... a special policy shall be considered an uninsured motor vehicle. N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1 designates who is qualified to receive the medical benefits provided ... occupying . . . an automobile . . . for which personal injury protection benefits under . . . ([ N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1 are equivalent to those afforded by the default provision in ... required in the standard policy or provided by the UCJF. N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1. Because Sanders is not qualified to opt for the limited ... Because Leslie's vehicle is considered an "uninsured vehicle" under N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1 (emphasis added), evinces an expressed intent on the part of ... Simply stated, they are different coverages. Thus, our reading of N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1 indicates a legislative intent to provide Sanders the reasonable and ...

docket:	a4335-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-06-19
status:	published
citation:	401 N.J.Super. 125
Document Size:	51235

3 Omar Sanders v. Norma K. Langemeier, et al. and New Jersey Property-Liability -- rank: 914

... for UCJF benefits, a claimant must satisfy four separate requirements. N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1. In this case, three of those requirements are not in ... the plain language of the statute creating the UCJF benefits, N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1, and of the statutes governing automobile insurance, see N.J ... required under the automobile insurance statute, was "not . . . in effect." N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1. Stated in the alternative, this aspect of the statute provides ... L. 1972, c. 70 ([ 39:6A-1 et seq.)." See N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1. Although at the time of its enactment only one type ... personal injury protection coverage," as used in the UCJF statute, N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1, is a general term that encompasses both the "personal injury ... our conclusion for the following reasons. First, the UCJF statute, N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1, in describing "personal injury protection coverage" refers generally to ...

docket:	a-49-08
court:
decided:	2009-05-04
status:
citation:	199 N.J. 366 972 A.2d 1103
Document Size:	81551

4 ALICIA MENA & ET ALS VS UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND & ET ALS -- rank: 904

... payable from UCJF. As such, plaintiffs' claim is governed by N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1.     The original version of N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1, L. 1972, c. 198, § 7 (effective Jan. 1, 1973), included ... Supreme Court has noted,         [I]n the 1983 amendments to N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1, the Legislature has slightly reworded these disqualifications to incorporate again ...

docket:	a2174-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-12-30
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	43878

5 GAIL BROWN v. FANNIE Y. WILLIAMS, et al. -- rank: 888

... guise of resolving an apparent conflict with the terms of N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1 that antedate the enactment of L. 2003, c. 89, and ... there is no insurance policy covering the accident at issue. N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1, too, was amended in other respects by L. 2003, c ... L. 2003, c. 89. In any event, the terms of N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1 may well be taken to provide a pedestrian claimant with ...

docket:	A3029-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-07-13
status:	published
citation:	394 N.J. Super. 507 927 A.2d 579
Document Size:	53899

6 Jimenez v. Baglieri -- rank: 862

... recoverable from the Fund consist of basic PIP coverage, see N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1 and -86.4, and recovery for bodily injury and property ... the same by making PIP benefits available to both. See N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1 and -86.4.     The Legislature's desire to treat both ...

docket:	a-25-97
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1998-01-29
status:
citation:	152 N.J. 337
Document Size:	38166

7 JANNA IRVING v. KEILAMARA C. OLIVEIRA -- rank: 626

... basis that she failed to meet the lawsuit threshold under N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1, and for a judgment against UCJF/PLIGA for her noneconomic ...

docket:	a4663-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-04-08
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	31767

8 STEPHEN ROBERTS v. MALVYN ST. LOUIS -- rank: 557

... coverage from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1. The plaintiff argued that the uninsured vehicle was an "automobile ...

docket:	a1173-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-11-17
status:
citation:
Document Size:	25568

9 SUBHASH TANDON AND SUDERSHAN TANDON v. EDWARD P. HAMILTON, et al. -- rank: 547

... enactment of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 and N.J.S.A. 39:6-86.1 and for UCJFB to pay PIP benefits without the uninsured ...

docket:	A2340-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-07-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	47172