Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 GEORGE C. EVERETT v. STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY -- rank: 1000

... App. Div. 1979). The Act was later amended to include N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1.     In general terms, statutes of limitations, including those set forth in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, are based on goals of "achieving security and stability in ... 1982) (citations and quotations omitted).]     In discussing the meaning of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, the Ochs Court noted:         Significantly, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1 comes into play when the insured is pursuing an action ... of "the last payment of benefits" in the context of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1. State Farm argues the statute should be read literally. That ... v. City Council , 55 N.J. 86 , 100 (1969)).]     Construing N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1 in the context of the Act and according due ...

docket:	a4520-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2002-12-31
status:	published
citation:	358 N.J. Super. 400
Document Size:	44475

2 JACQUELINE JOHNSON v. REPUBLIC WESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 990

... that the limitations period provided by the automobile PIP statute, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, should apply. Pursuant to that provision, an action for PIP ... paid by defendant was on February 6, 2003. Thus, under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, the latest time for filing a complaint would have been ... 28-1.6 while creating a detailed limitations scheme under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, or to refer specifically to the automobile PIP statute of ... 1.6 was governed by the limitations period contained in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, and entered an order dated April 3, 2006, dismissing Johnson ... be made to the estate of the decedent. Nor does N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, which contains a detailed list of the types of policies ... legislative oversight to constrict the availability of this coverage. Reversed. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1 provides that: a. Every action for the payment of ...

docket:	A3968-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-03-16
status:	published
citation:	391 N.J. Super. 194 917 A.2d 803
Document Size:	44663

3 AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF DELAWARE v. 4M INTERPRISE, INC -- rank: 953

... claim for reimbursement was filed beyond the time permitted by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1. 4 This statute applies to claims made by an insured ... A. 39:6A-3.1, -3.3, -4 and -10. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1. It does not apply to claims under a liability insurance ...

docket:	a3490-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-06
status:	published
citation:	431 N.J.Super. 514 70 A.3d 757
Document Size:	42904

4 BERLIN MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, P.A., et al. v. CMI NEW JERSEY OPERATING CORPORATION, et al. -- rank: 835

... of limitations to recover PIP benefits is two years, see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, and that plaintiffs' complaint filed in May 2003 would appear ...

docket:	A3034-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-08-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	97444

5 FELICIANO PRATTS v. CHRISTINE A. HULME and MARY C. WILSON -- rank: 832

... not governed by the two-year statute of limitations provision, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, found in the New Jersey Automobile Reparation Reform Act, N ... that the Act's two-year statute-of-limitations provision, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, barred any relief to American because Pratts never filed a ... later than two years after the last payment of benefits. [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a).] (continued) (continued) 14 A-2773-06T1 December 20, 2007 ...

docket:	A2773-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-12-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	60165

6 ISMAEL CRUZ-DIAZ v. PETER J. HENDRICKS -- rank: 813

... was time barred, pursuant to the PIP statute of limitations. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1. We affirm, rejecting plaintiff's argument that payment of transportation ... against it, arguing that the suit was time barred under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1. Plaintiff opposed the motion on three grounds: 1) the September ... statute of limitations expired on April 3, 2004 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, which requires that actions to recover PIP benefits be commenced ... within the meaning of the No Fault Act. We disagree. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1 requires that an action for PIP benefits: [S]hall be ... Limitations Plaintiff contends that the statute of limitations contained in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1 was tolled because plaintiff was "insane" within the meaning of ... We reject this argument because the PIP statute of limitations, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a), is not included in those claims which can ...

docket:	a4608-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-08-10
status:	published
citation:	409 N.J. Super. 268 976 A.2d 1092
Document Size:	38753

7 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. VS EILEEN CROCKER -- rank: 785

... N.J.S.A. 39:6A-6 (collateral source provisions); N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1 (statute of limitations). We cannot conceive that the Legislature so ...

docket:	a3686-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-03-08
status:	published
citation:	288 N.J.Super. 250
Document Size:	18572

8 ROSA APONTE CORREA, ET AL S ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. -- rank: 770

... about. Because we did “not think that the Legislature, in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, was concerned with barring actions for claims voluntarily paid,” Bell ... second part of the statute. We stated:             The proviso in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1 . . . does not narrow plaintiff's rights under the statute. It ... with either the first part or the second part of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1 and with our prior holdings in Bell v. Western Employer ...

docket:	a3469-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	1999-01-15
status:	published
citation:	317 N.J.Super. 597
Document Size:	24142

9 ZORAIDA RAMOS v. ALLSTATE NEW JERSEY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 701

... Allstate) because it was filed beyond the time required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a). We affirm. On November 4, 2004, plaintiff was injured ... dismissed because it was filed beyond the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a). The trial court considered the matter on December 22 ... payment was on November 7, 2006, plaintiff was required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a) to file her complaint within two years of that ... a claim for PIP benefits beyond the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a). The court stated that plaintiff and her attorney had ... court erred by finding that her complaint was barred by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a). The statute provides in pertinent part that actions for ... The insurer denied her claim for PIP benefits, relying upon N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1. Ibid. The plaintiff brought suit about fifteen months after ...

docket:	a2131-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-03-31
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22711

10 LINDSAY SALOMON v. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 680

... the accident/two years of any uncompensated expense pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a)." 1 The complaint was not filed either within four ... s claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a). Plaintiff filed opposition, together with a cross-motion for ... complaint had not been filed within the time required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a). The judge accordingly entered an order dated January 25 ... whether plaintiff filed her lawsuit within the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a). The statute provides that: [e]very action for the ... Ins. Co. , 162 N.J. 318 (2000), the Court interpreted N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a) to mean that an action for PIP benefits "is ... did not file her lawsuit within the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a). Affirmed. 1 The trial judge determined that, based ...

docket:	a3179-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25360

11 MICHAEL KIRK v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 673

... the judge concluded the PIP two-year statute of limitations, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, barred plaintiff's request to reform the automobile policy to ... judge erroneously applied the two-year PIP statute of limitations, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, to bar this claim. Relying on Pizzullo v. N.J ...

docket:	a2390-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-06-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	37214

12 ABDUL H. MUHAMMAD v. ELIZABETH YELLOW CAB INC -- rank: 658

... conclusions de novo. Henry , supra , 204 N.J. at 330. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, provides in pertinent part: a. Every action for the payment ...

docket:	a4197-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-05-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33244

13 EBBY WASHINGTON VS MARKET TRANSITION FACILITY -- rank: 645

... once again to address the statute of limitations prescribed by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1 for the commencement of an action against an automobile insurer ... grounds, taking the position that the two years permitted by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1 started to run on January 23, 1993, the date on ... the ambiguities in the two-year/four-year formulation of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1, and more particularly, to resolve the question of whether the ...

docket:	a4979-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-12-03
status:	published
citation:	295 N.J.Super. 368
Document Size:	14910

14 MEITAL RAVIV v. FARMER'S INSURANCE GROUP, -- rank: 624

... accident or two years after the last payment of benefits. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1(a). "A trial court's interpretation of the law and ...

docket:	a5074-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-07-15
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	23190

15 KAREN METAKES PARISI VS AETNA CAS. & SURETY CO. -- rank: 611

... chargeable with knowing that the primary coverage will be inadequate. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1 requires the action for PIP benefits to be brought within ... its anti-stacking and deemer arguments, it relied exclusively on N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1. The trial judge, concluding that the suit was not thereunder ... address one final matter. Plaintiff points to that provision of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-13.1 extending the limitations period to two years following the last ...

docket:	a5988-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-01-06
status:	published
citation:	296 N.J.Super. 179
Document Size:	17526