Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 39:6a-3")   1 to 15 of 117 results. Run time: 0.816 seconds | Search time: 0.809 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next 15
1 Joshua Haines v. Jacob W. Taft -- rank: 1000
... policy pursuant to section 4 of L. 1998, c. 21 ([ N.J.S.A.] 39:6A-3.1) and amounts collectible or paid for benefits under a ... policy pursuant to section 45 of L. 2003, c. 89 ([N.J.S.A.] 39:6A-3.3), to an injured person, including the amounts of any ... policy pursuant to section 4 of L. 1998, c. 21 ([ N.J.S.A.] 39:6A-3.1) or benefits under a special automobile insurance policy pursuant to section 45 of L. 2003, c. 89 ([ N.J.S.A.] 39:6A-3.3) to the injured person, nor shall they speculate as ... insurance options with decreased coverage in exchange for lower premiums, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 (1998). 2. With respect to the availability of decreased ... 250,000 medical expense benefits coverage mandatedā€¯ prior to AICRA. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.2(a) (1998); N.J.S.A. 39:6A- ...
docket: a-13-14-17
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2019-03-26
status:
citation:
Document Size: 102160
2 COALITION FOR QUALITY HEALTH CARE, et al. v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE, DIVISION OF INSURANCE, -- rank: 997
... time reducing unnecessary costs" which had resulted in increased premiums. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1a (the basic plan).] See footnote 1 1     With regard ... requirement shall apply within ten days of the insured event.         [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1a and -4a.]     Of course the specific types of services ... policies that require precertification of all, or essentially all, services. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 and - 4. In its July 1999 "guideline," the DOBI ... Super. 59 , 72 (App. Div. 1995)).     The plain language of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1a and -4a authorizes precertification of "certain" but not all ... medical standards or input from the medical profession." We disagree. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1a and - 4a authorize the DOBI to develop protocols or ... requirements, and instead requires only Commissioner approval of precertification plans. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1a and -4a. The Legislature treated the two subjects ...
docket: a3312-99
court: njappellate
decided: 2002-03-04
status: published
citation: 348 N.J. Super. 272
Document Size: 102897
3 Guerline Felix v. Brian V. Richards -- rank: 987
... Legislature added in the first sentence an express reference to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, which sets forth requirements for a basic policy. In ... 39:6B-1. And the second sentenceā€™s reference to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 does not establish that the Legislature implicitly intended to convert ... defies logic and sensibility that by retaining the reference to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, the Legislature intended to make so large scale a change ... of N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1(a) or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and that, because both statutes can be satisfied by policies ... such vehicles must comply with compulsory insurance coverage limits. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, -4. The Legislature established a standard policy setting the minimal ... BI unless an optional $10,000 amount is selected. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. The other is the special policy, created in ...
docket: a-27-18
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2020-02-26
status:
citation:
Document Size: 80420
4 New Jersey Transit Corporation v. Sandra Sanchez -- rank: 956
... expense benefits under a basic automobile insurance policy pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1], and amounts collectible or paid for benefits under a special automobile insurance policy pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3] to an injured person, including the amounts of any ... 6A-4 and -10], the medical expense benefits provided in [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] and the benefits provided in [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3] shall be payable as loss accrues, upon written notice ... 6A-4 and -10], the medical expense benefits provided in [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] and the benefits provided in [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3]. The collateral source rule imposes the primary obligation ...
docket: a-68-18
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2020-05-12
status:
citation:
Document Size: 108237
5 GUERLINE FELIX v. BRIAN V. RICHARDS -- rank: 882
... coverage. New Jersey now permits its residents the option under N.J.S.A. 39:6A- 3.1, to purchase an automobile insurance policy with no BI ... at 348 (citing N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1; N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3).] 'In addition, the [D]eemer statute guarantees the out-of ... options, a basic policy and a standard policy.' Ibid. Under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, a standard policy requires the owner of an automobile that ... c. 70 (C. 39:6A-3 and 39:6A-4).' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. Under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(c), an owner of an automobile registered or principally ... c. 21, Ā§ 72, the Legislature inserted a reference to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. In the second sentence, which is the original ...
docket: a5093-16
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-08-01
status:
citation:
Document Size: 35535
6 United Reciprocal Exchange v. Sabrina A. Perez, et al. -- rank: 868
... an alternative to the benefits covered under the standard policy. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. Although, in contrast to the standard policy, the basic ... injury liability coverage in an amount up to $10,000. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(c). (pp. 11-14) 3. Pre-AICRA, New Jerseyā ... in Varjabedian , this appeal involves a basic policy, which, under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(c), mandates no minimum bodily injury coverage but provides ... that includes the optional $10,000 of coverage permitted by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(c). (pp. 16-17) 5. Where a policy is ... required to pay any claims to injured third parties because N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 does not mandate a minimum amount of liability coverage ... be the minimum coverage mandated by New Jersey law. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3; N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1. CURE appealed ...
docket: a-67-13
court: New Jersey Supreme Court
decided: 2015-08-13
status:
citation:
Document Size: 69132
7 KIMBA MEDICAL SUPPLY v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NJ -- rank: 858
... a "Basic" policy with $15,000 in PIP benefits. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 (delineating the reduced level of coverage alternatively provided under ... Basic policy, as contrasted with a "Standard" policy issued under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and -4). After Galeano assigned his PIP benefits to Kimba ... 000 in PIP coverage, rather than only $15,000. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(a) and -4(a). In addition, Kimba argued that ... original DRP's] interpretation of the . . . statutory scheme is incorrect. [ N.J.S.A. ] 39:6A-3.1 provides that as an alternative to the mandatory coverages ... B]asic automobile policy pursuant to Section 4, which is [ N.J.S.A. 39:]6A-3.1, or a special automobile insurance policy. Election ļ‚¾ and ... applicable statute, a coverage selection form at that time. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.2(a). We reject Kimba's contention that Allstate ...
docket: a1902-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-07-05
status: published
citation: 431 N.J.Super. 463 70 A.3d 725
Document Size: 93859
8 KIMBA MEDICAL SUPPLY v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NJ -- rank: 858
... a "Basic" policy with $15,000 in PIP benefits. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 (delineating the reduced level of coverage alternatively provided under ... Basic policy, as contrasted with a "Standard" policy issued under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and -4). After Galeano assigned his PIP benefits to Kimba ... 000 in PIP coverage, rather than only $15,000. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(a) and -4(a). In addition, Kimba argued that ... original DRP's] interpretation of the . . . statutory scheme is incorrect. [ N.J.S.A. ] 39:6A-3.1 provides that as an alternative to the mandatory coverages ... B]asic automobile policy pursuant to Section 4, which is [ N.J.S.A. 39:]6A-3.1, or a special automobile insurance policy. Election ļ‚¾ and ... applicable statute, a coverage selection form at that time. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.2(a). We reject Kimba's contention that Allstate ...
docket: a1443-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-07-05
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 93684
9 JOSHUA HAINES v. JACOB W TAFT -- rank: 848
... expense benefits under a basic automobile insurance policy pursuant to . . . [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] and amounts collectible or paid for benefits under a special automobile insurance policy pursuant to . . . [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3], to an injured person, including the amounts of any ...
docket: a5503-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-04-27
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 52745
10 AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF DELAWARE v. 4M INTERPRISE, INC -- rank: 834
... s estate under policies of "automobile insurance" issued pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, -3.3, -4 and -10. N.J.S.A ...
docket: a3490-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-02-06
status: published
citation: 431 N.J.Super. 514 70 A.3d 757
Document Size: 42904
11 ALMA GUERRERO v. HELEN COLLEEN MOORE -- rank: 824
... PIP coverage up to $15,000 per person, per accident. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. Low income individuals, who are either eligible or enrolled ... policies are approved by the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3. However, standard automobile insurance policies must contain PIP coverage ... if a New Jersey resident is not in compliance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. This ... did not have an insurance policy that complied with either N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4; therefore ... amount is $10,000 less than what is required under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 and $245,000 less than what is required ...
docket: a4197-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-01-05
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 24923
12 OMAR SANDERS v. NORMA K. LANGEMEIER -- rank: 807
... policy issued by Clarendon National Insurance Company (Clarendon) pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3. Langemeier was insured with a standard automobile policy issued ... Legislature adopted the Automobile Insurance Coverage Act (AICRA). Under AICRA, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 continued the requirement that every owner of a motor vehicle ... non-compulsory option known as the "basic automobile insurance policy." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. Later, in 2003, the Legislature created the "special automobile insurance policy," N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3. The basic policy allows for up to $250,000 ... treated immediately following an accident at an acute care facility. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. It is also required to contain reduced PIP coverage ... provide "optional liability insurance coverage" with limits of $10,000. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1c. The special policy was established by the Legislature "[ ...
docket: a4335-06
court: njappellate
decided: 2008-06-19
status: published
citation: 401 N.J.Super. 125
Document Size: 51235
13 Denise A. Perrelli v. Bridget Pastorelle -- rank: 807
... mandated by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] shall have no cause of action for recovery of ...
docket: A-22-10
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2011-06-01
status:
citation:
Document Size: 76489
14 STEPHANIE JOSEPHS v. CHRISTINA M. HEPP -- rank: 795
... expense benefits of at least $250,000, as required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3. The judge noted that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 allows owners of automobiles to select a basic insurance ... coverage mandated by [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3] shall have no cause of action for recovery of ... benefits of $15,000 per person, per accident, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, or qualifies for a special auto insurance policy under N.J.S.A. 39:6A- 3.3. In this case, the motion judge erroneously stated ...
docket: a1474-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-02-20
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 31346
15 Edward Zabilowicz v. Roslyne Kelsey -- rank: 787
... S.A. 17:28-1.4, the Deemer Statute, and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, -3.3, or -3.4. Unless the defendant meets ... provide out-of-state residents with liability insurance pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, uninsured motorist insurance pursuant to N.J.S.A. 17 ... J.S.A. 39:6A-4], personal injury protection coverage, [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1], medical expense benefits coverage, or [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3] regardless of fault, applies, . . . is hereby exempted from tort ... S.A. 39:6A-4], medical expense benefits pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] or benefits pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3], or is a person who has a right ...
docket: a-87-08
court: supreme
decided: 2009-12-17
status:
citation: 200 N.J. 507 984 A.2d 872
Document Size: 25378
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!