Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 39:6a-3.1")   1 to 15 of 62 results. Run time: 0.870 seconds | Search time: 0.863 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 Next 15
1 Guerline Felix v. Brian V. Richards -- rank: 1000
... Legislature added in the first sentence an express reference to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, which sets forth requirements for a basic policy. In the ... BI unless an optional $10,000 amount is selected. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. The other is the special policy, created in 2003, which ... which now states that, “[e]xcept as provided by [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1],” (the statute authorizing creation of a basic policy), the ... the first sentence, the Legislature added the express reference to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 and its requirements for a basic policy. That first sentence ... 6A-4) or section 4 of L. 1998, c. 21 ([ N.J.S.A.] 39:6A-3.1) and who is not otherwise eligible for such benefits, whenever ... statute’s first sentence, “[e]xcept as provided by [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1],” amounts to an exception within N.J.S. ...
docket: a-27-18
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2020-02-26
status:
citation:
Document Size: 80420
2 Joshua Haines v. Jacob W. Taft -- rank: 918
... policy pursuant to section 4 of L. 1998, c. 21 ([ N.J.S.A.] 39:6A-3.1) and amounts collectible or paid for benefits under a special ... policy pursuant to section 4 of L. 1998, c. 21 ([ N.J.S.A.] 39:6A-3.1) or benefits under a special automobile insurance policy pursuant to ... insurance options with decreased coverage in exchange for lower premiums, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 (1998). 2. With respect to the availability of decreased PIP ... to exceed $15,000 per person” for non-catastrophic injuries. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(a). In 2003, the Legislature established the “special policy ...
docket: a-13-14-17
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2019-03-26
status:
citation:
Document Size: 102160
3 COALITION FOR QUALITY HEALTH CARE, et al. v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND INSURANCE, DIVISION OF INSURANCE, -- rank: 906
... policies that require precertification of all, or essentially all, services. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 and - 4. In its July 1999 "guideline," the DOBI indicated ...
docket: a3312-99
court: njappellate
decided: 2002-03-04
status: published
citation: 348 N.J. Super. 272
Document Size: 102897
4 New Jersey Transit Corporation v. Sandra Sanchez -- rank: 904
... expense benefits under a basic automobile insurance policy pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1], and amounts collectible or paid for benefits under a special ... 6A-4 and -10], the medical expense benefits provided in [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] and the benefits provided in [N.J.S.A. 39 ... 6A-4 and -10], the medical expense benefits provided in [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] and the benefits provided in [N.J.S.A. 39 ... of losses “collectible or paid” by PIP benefits under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, -3.3, -4, -4.3, or -10. N.J.S ...
docket: a-68-18
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2020-05-12
status:
citation:
Document Size: 108237
5 GUERLINE FELIX v. BRIAN V. RICHARDS -- rank: 902
... coverage. New Jersey now permits its residents the option under N.J.S.A. 39:6A- 3.1, to purchase an automobile insurance policy with no BI coverage ... c. 70 (C. 39:6A-3 and 39:6A-4).' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. Under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(c), an owner of an automobile registered or principally garaged ... c. 21, § 72, the Legislature inserted a reference to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. In the second sentence, which is the original portion of ... The second sentence was not amended to expressly refer to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. We reject GEICO's argument that AICRA's creation of ... otherwise would apply. The Deemer statute makes one reference to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 but that is in the first sentence of the ...
docket: a5093-16
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-08-01
status:
citation:
Document Size: 35535
6 K. Johnson v. Roselle EZ Quick LLC -- rank: 885
... 4 or 39:6A-10], medical expense benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] or benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A ...
docket: a-33-14
court: New Jersey Supreme Court
decided: 2016-01-05
status:
citation:
Document Size: 107061
7 AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF DELAWARE v. 4M INTERPRISE, INC -- rank: 878
... s estate under policies of "automobile insurance" issued pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, -3.3, -4 and -10. N.J.S.A. 39 ...
docket: a3490-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-02-06
status: published
citation: 431 N.J.Super. 514 70 A.3d 757
Document Size: 42904
8 KIMBA MEDICAL SUPPLY v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NJ -- rank: 859
... a "Basic" policy with $15,000 in PIP benefits. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 (delineating the reduced level of coverage alternatively provided under a ... 000 in PIP coverage, rather than only $15,000. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(a) and -4(a). In addition, Kimba argued that Standard ... original DRP's] interpretation of the . . . statutory scheme is incorrect. [ N.J.S.A. ] 39:6A-3.1 provides that as an alternative to the mandatory coverages provided ... B]asic automobile policy pursuant to Section 4, which is [ N.J.S.A. 39:]6A-3.1, or a special automobile insurance policy. Election  and my ...
docket: a1443-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-07-05
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 93684
9 KIMBA MEDICAL SUPPLY v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NJ -- rank: 859
... a "Basic" policy with $15,000 in PIP benefits. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 (delineating the reduced level of coverage alternatively provided under a ... 000 in PIP coverage, rather than only $15,000. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(a) and -4(a). In addition, Kimba argued that Standard ... original DRP's] interpretation of the . . . statutory scheme is incorrect. [ N.J.S.A. ] 39:6A-3.1 provides that as an alternative to the mandatory coverages provided ... B]asic automobile policy pursuant to Section 4, which is [ N.J.S.A. 39:]6A-3.1, or a special automobile insurance policy. Election  and my ...
docket: a1902-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-07-05
status: published
citation: 431 N.J.Super. 463 70 A.3d 725
Document Size: 93859
10 United Reciprocal Exchange v. Sabrina A. Perez, et al. -- rank: 844
... an alternative to the benefits covered under the standard policy. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. Although, in contrast to the standard policy, the basic policy ... injury liability coverage in an amount up to $10,000. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(c). (pp. 11-14) 3. Pre-AICRA, New Jersey’s ... in Varjabedian , this appeal involves a basic policy, which, under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(c), mandates no minimum bodily injury coverage but provides that ... that includes the optional $10,000 of coverage permitted by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(c). (pp. 16-17) 5. Where a policy is rescinded ... required to pay any claims to injured third parties because N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 does not mandate a minimum amount of liability coverage under ... supports the position advanced by CURE. ICNJ maintains that, under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, the mandatory minimum bodily injury liability coverage provided by ...
docket: a-67-13
court: New Jersey Supreme Court
decided: 2015-08-13
status:
citation:
Document Size: 69132
11 Denise A. Perrelli v. Bridget Pastorelle -- rank: 806
... mandated by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4 or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] shall have no cause of action for recovery of economic ...
docket: A-22-10
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2011-06-01
status:
citation:
Document Size: 76489
12 HERIBERTO CABALLERO-GONZALEZ v. HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 792
... N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 (emphasis added); see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, -3.3(b); N.J.S.A. 39:6B- 1 ...
docket: a0875-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-12-29
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 64590
13 LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. PENSKE TRUCK LEASING, CO. -- rank: 778
... 39:6A-4 or -10], medical expense benefits pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1] or benefits pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A ...
docket: a5624-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-05-23
status: Published
citation: 459 N.J.Super. 223 208 A.3d 888
Document Size: 30742
14 OMAR SANDERS v. NORMA K. LANGEMEIER -- rank: 751
... non-compulsory option known as the "basic automobile insurance policy." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. Later, in 2003, the Legislature created the "special automobile insurance ... treated immediately following an accident at an acute care facility. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. It is also required to contain reduced PIP coverage in ...
docket: a4335-06
court: njappellate
decided: 2008-06-19
status: published
citation: 401 N.J.Super. 125
Document Size: 51235
15 EXCHANGE v. SABRINA A. PEREZ -- rank: 737
... an "alternative" to the mandatory coverage of the standard policy, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. The pertinent feature of the new limited basic policy was ... an "optional liability insurance coverage" with a $10,000 limit. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1(c). In Mannion , supra , 380 N.J. Super. at 265 ... Varjabedian : The alternative coverage provided by a basic policy under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1 mandates no minimum amount of liability coverage. It only provides ... insurance policy with $10,000 of liability coverage, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. The majority holds that plaintiff CURE, the insurance carrier, must ... policy at issue here is a basic policy authorized by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1. It was issued with $10,000 maximum liability coverage. As ...
docket: a3100-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-09-13
status: published
citation: 432 N.J.Super. 526 75 A.3d 1233
Document Size: 36937
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!