Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Guerline Felix v. Brian V. Richards -- rank: 1000

... income eligibility requirement for participation and no optional BI. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3. Eligible insureds may satisfy New Jersey’s insurance law requirements ...

docket:	a-27-18
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2020-02-26
status:
citation:
Document Size:	80420

2 Joshua Haines v. Jacob W. Taft -- rank: 970

... policy pursuant to section 45 of L. 2003, c. 89 ([N.J.S.A.] 39:6A-3.3), to an injured person, including the amounts of any deductibles ... policy pursuant to section 45 of L. 2003, c. 89 ([ N.J.S.A.] 39:6A-3.3) to the injured person, nor shall they speculate as to ... satisfying the 7 mandatory private passenger automobile insurance requirements.” N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3(a) (2003). In exchange for the lowest possible premium, an ... to exceed $250,000 per person per accident.” See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3(b)(1). The Legislature enacted AICRA and other amendments to ...

docket:	a-13-14-17
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2019-03-26
status:
citation:
Document Size:	102160

3 New Jersey Transit Corporation v. Sandra Sanchez -- rank: 915

... for benefits under a special automobile insurance policy pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3] to an injured person, including the amounts of any deductibles ... A. 39:6A-3.1] and the benefits provided in [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3] shall be payable as loss accrues, upon written notice of ... A. 39:6A-3.1] and the benefits provided in [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3]. The collateral source rule imposes the primary obligation to pay ... opt for special insurance that does not require liability coverage. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3. 7 The Workers’ Compensation Act, passed in 1911 -- over sixty ...

docket:	a-68-18
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2020-05-12
status:
citation:
Document Size:	108237

4 United Reciprocal Exchange v. Sabrina A. Perez, et al. -- rank: 872

... insurance carriers. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1; N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3; Sponsor’s Statement to S. 3 (Apr. 24, 1998). Although ...

docket:	a-67-13
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2015-08-13
status:
citation:
Document Size:	69132

5 OMAR SANDERS v. NORMA K. LANGEMEIER -- rank: 830

... policy issued by Clarendon National Insurance Company (Clarendon) pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3. Langemeier was insured with a standard automobile policy issued by ... in 2003, the Legislature created the "special automobile insurance policy," N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3. The basic policy allows for up to $250,000 in ... compliance in satisfying the mandatory private passenger automobile insurance requirements." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3 . In setting the limited income criteria for qualification, the statute ... to say, the limited emergency medical benefits, as defined by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, do not match the definition of PIP benefits required in ... previously indicated, the "[e]mergency personal injury coverage" afforded under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3 is different from "personal injury protection benefits" afforded and defined ...

docket:	a4335-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-06-19
status:	published
citation:	401 N.J.Super. 125
Document Size:	51235

6 JOSHUA HAINES v. JACOB W TAFT -- rank: 825

... for benefits under a special automobile insurance policy pursuant to . . . [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3], to an injured person, including the amounts of any deductibles ...

docket:	a5503-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-27
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	52745

7 ALMA GUERRERO v. HELEN COLLEEN MOORE -- rank: 817

... policies are approved by the Commissioner of Banking and Insurance. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3. However, standard automobile insurance policies must contain PIP coverage not ... compliance with N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. This gives ... 4. Plaintiff was not entitled to special automobile insurance under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, because plaintiff was not eligible for Medicaid. 2 Because plaintiff ... Plaintiff argues the special automobile insurance policy provided for in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3 was designed to allow drivers who have limited financial resources ... of persons the statute was designed to protect. We disagree. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3 specifically makes clear the program is only available for those ...

docket:	a4197-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-01-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24923

8 KEVIN ROBINSON v. MICHAEL ZORN -- rank: 785

... part of that effort, a special automobile insurance policy (SAIP), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3. 3 A SAIP provides limited automobile insurance. The central question ... also reject plaintiff's contention that the SAIP, authorized by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, renders Ross nugatory. In 2002, Governor James McGreevey signed into ... As part of the overall insurance reform, the Legislature enacted N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, creating the SAIP. The bill stated that a. In order ... occurred "after the events at issue." Id. at 141. 3 N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3 "creat[ed a] 'special' policy allowing certain low income persons ... 9 This is identical to the language currently used in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3. This archive is a service of Rutgers School of Law ...

docket:	a3152-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-17
status:	published
citation:	430 N.J.Super. 312 64 A.3d 571
Document Size:	48182

9 Edward Zabilowicz v. Roslyne Kelsey -- rank: 782

... A. 39:6A-3.1], medical expense benefits coverage, or [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3] regardless of fault, applies, . . . is hereby exempted from tort liability ... S.A. 39:6A-3.1] or benefits pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3], or is a person who has a right to receive ... forth in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, 'basic,' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, automobile policies allowed by statute. 12 fault system is not ...

docket:	a-87-08
court:	supreme
decided:	2009-12-17
status:
citation:	200 N.J. 507 984 A.2d 872
Document Size:	25378

10 STEPHANIE JOSEPHS v. CHRISTINA M. HEPP -- rank: 745

... 4, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3] shall have no cause of action for recovery of economic ... 1, or qualifies for a special auto insurance policy under N.J.S.A. 39:6A- 3.3. In this case, the motion judge erroneously stated that plaintiff ... 4, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.1, or N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3. Because plaintiff did not maintain insurance required under New Jersey ...

docket:	a1474-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-02-20
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31346

11 VANESSA RIVERA v. ELMER F. McCRAY, III -- rank: 702

... 2 . The issue presented is whether a "special policy," see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, which provides no UIM coverage at all, provides "similar coverage ... J.S.A. 39:6B-1(c), and described in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, is available only to certain Medicaid recipients of limited income ... law, a special policy "shall not provide . . . underinsured motorist coverage." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3(c). The policy, sold to Rivera for $360 a year ... party benefits for emergency medical expenses, and a death benefit. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3(b). It was designed to provide a mechanism for drivers ... comply with the compulsory insurance law, instead of driving uninsured. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3(a). Although the NJM policy does not define "coverage" or ...

docket:	a2337-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-05-02
status:	published
citation:	445 N.J.Super. 315 137 A.3d 1226
Document Size:	30280

12 New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co. v. Hardy -- rank: 697

... of the ownership, maintenance, use or operation of an automobile.� N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3, -3.1, and -4; N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 ...

docket:	a-79-02
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2004-01-27
status:
citation:	178 N.J. 327
Document Size:	45633

13 K. Johnson v. Roselle EZ Quick LLC -- rank: 690

... S.A. 39:6A-3.1] or benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3], as a result of an accident occurring within this State ...

docket:	a-33-14
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2016-01-05
status:
citation:
Document Size:	107061

14 Omar Sanders v. Norma K. Langemeier, et al. and New Jersey Property-Liability -- rank: 672

... coverage known as the "Dollar-A-Day" 1 policy, see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, has a right to seek reimbursement from the Unsatisfied Claim ... passenger, was insured by a "special automobile insurance policy," see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3, issued by defendant Clarendon National Insurance Company. That policy, often ...

docket:	a-49-08
court:
decided:	2009-05-04
status:
citation:	199 N.J. 366 972 A.2d 1103
Document Size:	81551

15 Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company v. Robert LaCroix, et al. -- rank: 670

... identified above apply to “special” policies issued pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3.3. None are relevant to the instant appeal. 8 New Jersey� ...

docket:	a-128-06
court:
decided:	2008-05-14
status:
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	88308