Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Joshua Haines v. Jacob W. Taft -- rank: 1000

... for $15,000 of coverage -- the minimum amount permitted under N.J.S.A. 39:6A- 4.3(e). Haines exhausted the PIP coverage. He claims to have ... paid or collectible under a standard policy,” ibid. (citing N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(e)), Haines and Little were barred from admitting evidence of ... subsection d. of section 13 of L. 1983, c. 362 ([ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3), otherwise compensated is inadmissible in a civil action for recovery ... subsection d. of section 13 of L. 1983, c. 362 ([ N.J.S.A.] 39:6A-4.3). Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the ... The choices included allowing motorists to select policies with deductibles, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(a) (1984), and to forego coverage for lost wages, essential services, and funeral expenses, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(b) (1984), as well as a provision for limitations ...

docket:	a-13-14-17
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2019-03-26
status:
citation:
Document Size:	102160

2 New Jersey Transit Corporation v. Sandra Sanchez -- rank: 915

... of any deductibles, copayments or exclusions, including exclusions pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3], otherwise compensated is inadmissible in a civil action for recovery ...

docket:	a-68-18
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2020-05-12
status:
citation:
Document Size:	108237

3 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 850

... subject to any option elected by the policyholder pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3]." Section 4.3 in turn requires automobile insurers to offer ... refers to the benefits provided under PIP coverage "pursuant to" N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, -3.1 and -3.3, which address auto insurance PIP benefits ... subject to any option elected by the policyholder pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3]." 289 N.J. Super. 406 , 409-10 (App. Div. 1996 ...

docket:	a0712-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-11-03
status:	published
citation:	403 N.J. Super. 518 959 A.2d 858
Document Size:	68704

4 JOSHUA HAINES v. JACOB W TAFT -- rank: 843

... elected PIP option allowed in a standard policy pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(e). For the reasons that follow, we conclude it does ... insurance provider as the primary payer of PIP benefits, see N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(d), Haines did not have health insurance at the time ... of any deductibles, copayments or exclusions, including exclusions pursuant to . . . [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3], otherwise compensated is inadmissible in a civil action for recovery ... subject to any option elected by the policyholder pursuant to . . . [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3]." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3 requires automobile insurers to provide the options for PIP coverage ... 000, $50,000 or $15,000 per person per accident." N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(e). Additionally, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4. ...

docket:	a5503-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-27
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	52745

5 ELIZABETH LOPEZ-NEGRON v. PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 830

... the primary payer of Personal Injury Protection ("PIP") benefits. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(d). This option is commonly referred to as a "health ... payers for injuries sustained by policyholders in motor vehicle accidents. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(d). As the Law Division motion judge correctly noted, the ... plaintiff's Coverage Selection Form ("CSF"), a form required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(f) and N.J.A.C. 11:3-15.7 ... the pop-up. The motion judge found it significant that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(f) provides a remedy for a situation when a policyholder ... law and additional deductible in the amount of $750." (quoting N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(f)). The judge disagreed with plaintiff's contention that auto ... insurance before issuing a health-first policy. He ruled that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(f) places the burden on the applicant, not on ...

docket:	a1632-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-03-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	103021

6 PEGGY BIRMINGHAM v. TRAVELERS NEW JERSEY INS. CO -- rank: 830

... cross-moved for summary judgment, and asserted that pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3, Travelers is required 'to provide a minimum of $15,000 ... do, as any such proposal would need to address that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3 clearly prescribes the minimum statutory limit for medical expense benefits ... Ins. Co. v. LaCroix, 194 N.J. 515 (2008) (stating ' N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3 is clear and unambiguous on its face and admits of ... introduction of deductibles. L. 1983, c. 362, § 13 (enacting N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3). The enactment required insurers to offer, 'at appropriately reduced premiums ... elected by the policyholder' pursuant to the concurrent amendment of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3. L. 1983, c. 362, § 7 (referencing id. § 13). In addition, the Legislature further amended N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3 to provide: No insurer or health provider providing benefits ...

docket:	a0429-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-03-31
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	48813

7 Thomas DeMarco v. Sean Robert Stoddard, D.P.M. -- rank: 750

... 19. The father was required to purchase PIP coverage under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3. Lacroix , supra , 194 N.J. at 532. We held that ...

docket:	A-104-13
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2015-12-01
status:
citation:	219 N.J. 131 97 A.3d 663
Document Size:	148694

8 K. Johnson v. Roselle EZ Quick LLC -- rank: 714

... health maintenance organization or governmental agency paying benefits pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3], personal injury protection benefits in accordance with [ N.J.S ...

docket:	a-33-14
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2016-01-05
status:
citation:
Document Size:	107061

9 NICOLE PIERIDES v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 714

... York law. PIP coverage in New Jersey is governed by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3, which requires the insurer to provide the following option: e ... apply to provide the coverage that would be available under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3. The New York policy provided $50,000 in PIP benefits ... A. 39:6B-1, which provides PIP benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, -3.1(a), -3.3(b)(1). See Zabilowicz , supra 200 ...

docket:	a2783-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-04-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	90263

10 RUTGERS CASUALTY INS. CO. VS THE OHIO CASUALTY INS. CO. -- rank: 714

... named insured under an automobile insurance policy of his own. ��������[ N.J.S.A 39:6A-4.3.] After the adoption of � 4.2, the Selected/Federal issue ...

docket:	a4103-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-04-01
status:	published
citation:	299 N.J.Super. 249
Document Size:	35044

11 ALPERT, GOLDBERG, BUTLER NORTON & WEISS, P.C. v. MICHAEL QUINN -- rank: 691

... J. Super. 176 , 181 (App. Div. 1994), superseded by statute , N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3, as recognized by David v. Gov't Employees Ins. Co ...

docket:	a5503-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-11-24
status:	published
citation:	410 N.J. Super. 510 983 A.2d 604
Document Size:	138269

12 Sofia T. Torres v. Javier Pabon -- rank: 688

... of any deductibles, copayments or exclusions, including exclusions pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3], otherwise compensated.” N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12 ...

docket:	A-116-13
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2016-06-01
status:
citation:	225 N.J. 167 137 A.3d 502
Document Size:	92686

13 PALISADES INSURANCE COMPANY , v. HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 688

... corporation providing health insurance benefits to its insureds. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(d), plaintiff allows its customers to designate their health insurer ... responsible for paying medical expenses arising out of automobile accidents. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(d). Choosing the health care insurance-as-primary option reduces ... the insured's car insurance premiums. A-2830-19 7 N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(f). Health insurers, in turn, are prohibited from including any ...

docket:	a2830-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-07-27
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	29518

14 JOHN K. DEVER v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY -- rank: 678

... Zabilowicz v. Kelsey , 200 N.J. 507 , 509 (2009) (citing N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4, -3.1(a), -3.3(b)(1)). "Those medical benefits are ...

docket:	a3102-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-10-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	60408

15 Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company v. Robert LaCroix, et al. -- rank: 668

... a claimant sustains one of the injuries set forth in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(e) and receives treatment at a trauma center or acute ... 326, 327 (1996) (same). We simply must clarify that amount. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3 sets forth “[p]ersonal injury protection coverage options.� ... to another facility in the judgment of the attending physician. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3 “‘is clear and unambiguous on its face and ... a claimant sustains one of the injuries set forth in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.3(e) and receives treatment at a trauma center or acute ...

docket:	a-128-06
court:
decided:	2008-05-14
status:
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	88308