Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 JOHN K. CUPIDO v. WILLIAM PEREZ -- rank: 1000

... named insured, and any immediate family member as defined in [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1], under that policy, shall be subject to the tort option ...

docket:	a4557-08
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-08-27
status:
citation:	415 N.J. Super. 587 2 A.3d 1159
Document Size:	30499

2 HAN HUNG LUONG v. FRANK T. GEORGE -- rank: 960

... named insured, and any immediate family member as defined in [N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1], under that policy, shall be subject to the tort option ...

docket:	a0878-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-12-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22970

3 ARTHUR L. HARRIATT v. CYNTHIA A. SCOTT, et al. -- rank: 917

... seeking to bind plaintiff to the verbal threshold. Relying on N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1 and noting that a person cannot be the spouse or ... A. 39:6A-2g or "an immediate family member" under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1. Id. at 299-300. The appellate panel noted that as ...

docket:	a4847-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-04-23
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	45797

4 GERARD NORTESANO v. DAVID TORRES-ROMERO -- rank: 910

... cannot now be obtained until age eighteen, we [find] that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1 was not intended to apply only to minor children or ...

docket:	A0521-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-12-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	43924

5 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. VS EILEEN CROCKER -- rank: 903

... named insured, and any immediate family member as defined in [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1], under that policy, shall be subject to the tort option ...

docket:	a3686-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-03-08
status:	published
citation:	288 N.J.Super. 250
Document Size:	18572

6 JUDITH MONTEMAYOR v. JAMES S. SIGNORELLI, et al. -- rank: 839

... App. Div. 2001), we also agree with Judge Yannotti that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1 was not intended to apply only to minor children or ... and independently have found none, to support the assertion that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1, and if so, whether that makes a material difference.     The ... because there the plaintiff was the insured's mother and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1 does not include a parent; plaintiff "was not [her daughter ...

docket:	A2435-99
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2001-04-19
status:	published
citation:	339 N.J. Super. 482
Document Size:	22948

7 GEORGIA VAMVAKIDIS et al. v. ROSE PETERS et al. -- rank: 835

... immediate family member of a named insured as defined by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1. Plaintiff met all of the conditions for applicability of the ... even more restrictive definition of "immediate family member" contained in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1 to mean exactly what it says, refusing, in Ibarra v ...

docket:	a2080-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-01-13
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	20487

8 STEVEN HARBOLD V. GERRI OLIN -- rank: 832

... expenses. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2.     Significantly, N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1, entitled "Election of tort option," sets forth the requirements with ... the tort option elected by that named insured shall apply .         [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1 (emphasis added).] Plaintiff is by this statute's clear language ... to maintain PIP coverage, from liability for non-economic damages. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1(d) mandates that this tort option elected by plaintiff's ...

docket:	a6246-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-01-31
status:	published
citation:	287 N.J.Super. 35
Document Size:	18239

9 RICHARD P. BADUINI et al. v. STEPHINA SERINA -- rank: 828

... named insured, or any immediate family member as defined in [ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1] under that policy, shall be subject to the tort option ...

docket:	A3842-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-03-10
status:	published
citation:	375 N.J. Super. 478 868 A.2d 372
Document Size:	21593

10 TOSHIBA A. STRICKLEN v. ERMANNO FERRUGGIA -- rank: 828

... to expand the definition of "immediate family member" contained in N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1 to include a parent of the named insured living in ... family member of the insured he was not bound under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1 by his girlfriend's selection of the verbal threshold tort ...

docket:	a4851-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-06-30
status:	published
citation:	379 N.J. Super. 296
Document Size:	63388

11 HOWARD MARTIN v. NIRAJ CHHABRA -- rank: 821

... insured, plaintiff's girlfriend, selected the verbal threshold cannot, under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1, bind plaintiff.     However, without knowing precisely why plaintiff had his ...

docket:	a4256-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-01-21
status:	published
citation:	374 N.J. Super. 387
Document Size:	24042

12 CHRISTIAN VOORHEES v. LILA R. UNKEL -- rank: 728

... the limitation on lawsuit threshold applied to plaintiff pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1 because, at the time of the accident, he was a ...

docket:	a6251-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18919

13 FERMINA IBARRA V. JASON J. VETRANO, ET AL. -- rank: 724

... Lourdes' carrier, Sentry, paid PIP benefits to plaintiff.     Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1 (section 8.1), Lourdes had elected the "verbal threshold" contained ...

docket:	a3243-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-06-30
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	13183

14 TIMOTHY F. LONG v. MERCURY INSURANCE GROUP -- rank: 707

... insurance. See N.J.S.A. 39:6A-23 and N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1. The Guide , prepared by the State Department of Banking and ...

docket:	a3238-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-01-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	49761

15 MICHAEL SYTSMA v. JOHN SERIGNESE -- rank: 678

... subject to the verbal threshold in their automobile insurance policy. N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8.1(a) provides, in pertinent part, that the tort option elected ...

docket:	a4776-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-07-16
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	20636