Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 In the Matter of Mildred Keri -- rank: 1000

... objects as the ward might have been expected to make. [ N.J.S.A. 3B:12-58.] In short, when managing the estates of incompetent persons, including ... such “as the ward might have been expected to make,” N.J.S.A. 3B:12-58. Together, those statutory provisions incorporate and reconcile the best interests ... decision that his mother “might have been expected to make,” N.J.S.A. 3B:12-58, and satisfies both the applicable statutes and the Trott criteria ...

docket:	a-70-02
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2004-08-05
status:
citation:	181 N.J. 50
Document Size:	67676

2 IN THE MATTER OF HENRIETTA NEUFELD COHEN -- rank: 923

... that it is in the best interests of the ward." N.J.S.A. 3B:12-58 provides:         If the estate is ample to provide for the ... proposed changes are not in Henrietta's "best interests" under N.J.S.A. 3B:12-58 and are not to "other objects as the ward might have been expected to make" under N.J.S.A. 3B:12-58. Contrary to Henrietta's testamentary plan, Howard's settlement plan ...

docket:	A0399-99
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2000-11-06
status:	published
citation:	335 N.J. Super. 13
Document Size:	54306

3 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1289-18.opn.html -- rank: 906

... The outcome of this appeal turns on the application of N.J.S.A. 3B:12-58, which provides: A-1289-18T4 6 [i]f the estate ... such 'as the ward might have been expected to make,' N.J.S.A. 3B:12-58. Together, those statutory provisions incorporate and reconcile the best interests ... mandates of N.J.S.A. 3B:12-50 and N.J.S.A. 3B:12-58 have been satisfied, our courts have applied the five-factor ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	19924

4 A-3 IN THE MATTER GUARDIANSHIP OF WALTER J. MACAK -- rank: 668

... gifts "as the ward might have been expected to make." N.J.S.A. 3B:12-58. However, in approving such an application, the court must find ...

docket:	A2399-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-04-27
status:	published
citation:	377 N.J. Super. 167 871 A.2d 767
Document Size:	28833