Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 ERNEST BOCK & SONS, INC. v. MERCER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY -- rank: 1000

... e)(1)(A). We add only the following brief comments. N.J.S.A. 40:11-23.2 provides, in pertinent part: When required by the bid ...

docket:	a0150-09
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-02-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46182

2 ERNEST BOCK & SONS, INC. v. MERCER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY -- rank: 1000

... e)(1)(A). We add only the following brief comments. N.J.S.A. 40:11-23.2 provides, in pertinent part: When required by the bid ...

docket:	a0199-09
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-02-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46182

3 ERNEST BOCK & SONS, INC. v. MERCER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY -- rank: 1000

... e)(1)(A). We add only the following brief comments. N.J.S.A. 40:11-23.2 provides, in pertinent part: When required by the bid ...

docket:	a0051-09
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-02-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46182

4 DIAMOND CONSTRUCTION v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY -- rank: 840

... the bid proposal that renders it defective and incurable under N.J.S.A. 40:11-23.2(d). Diamond submitted a palpably noncompliant bid to Jersey ...

docket:	a4225-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-12-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26022