Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 40:14b-28")   1 to 1 of 1 results. Run time: 0.788 seconds | Search time: 0.781 seconds    
1 VERNON TOWNSHIP v. SUSSEX COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY -- rank: 1000
... of the service contract with the 2008 bond resolution means N.J.S.A. 40:14B-28 applies. That statute places a hard limit of twenty days ... 107. Plaintiffs first assert the motion court incorrectly determined that N.J.S.A. 40:14B-28 bars the claim as a challenge to a bond resolution ... and binding obligations in accordance with their terms and tenor. [ N.J.S.A. 40:14B-28 (emphasis added).] Plaintiffs argue they have not challenged a bond ... statute clearly applies, and the present action is time-barred. N.J.S.A. 40:14B-28. The most plausible interpretation of 'provides for' is 'incorporates by ... which allows SCMUA to function.' These are the precise outcomes N.J.S.A. 40:14B-28 seeks to avoid. We conclude the 2005 service contract and ... by reference, and the present suit is time-barred under N.J.S.A. 40:14B-28. We need not reach any remaining arguments. Affirmed. A- ...
docket: a0897-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-02-16
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 25082

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!