21 Results for [("N.J.S.A. 40:27-6")]

Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

Results for ("N.J.S.A. 40:27-6") 1 to 15 of 21 results.	Run time: 0.858 seconds \| Search time: 0.851 seconds
Page:1 2 Next 6

1 Amerada Hess Corporation n/k/a Hess Corporation v. Burlington County Planning Board -- rank: 1000

... Court. The issue in this appeal is the meaning of N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7, a provision of the County Planning Act that directs ... s inaction had triggered automatic approval of its application under N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of ... the timetable set forth in the County Planning Act (CPA), N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7, the application is subject to automatic approval unless the ... shallā€¯ result in an automatic approval of the application. Specifically, N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7 provides that if the county planning board fails to ... be excused. (pp. 26-29) 7. Here, to comport with N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7, the County Board had to act within thirty days ... from seeking automatic approval. (pp. 34-36) 10. In enacting N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7, the Legislature drafted no exception for cases involving ...

docket:	a-41-07
court:
decided:	2008-07-16
status:
citation:	195 N.J. 616
Document Size:	109343

2 Amerada Hess Corporation n/k/a Hess Corporation v. Burlington County Planning Board -- rank: 983

... be found at 195 N.J. 616, . Original MSWord Version N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7, a provision of the County Planning Act that directs ... Court. The issue in this appeal is the meaning of N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7, a provision of the County Planning Act that directs ... s inaction had triggered automatic approval of its application under N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of ... the timetable set forth in the County Planning Act (CPA), N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7, the application is subject to automatic approval unless the ... shall" result in an automatic approval of the application. Specifically, N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7 provides that if the county planning board fails to ... be excused. (pp. 26-29) 7. Here, to comport with N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7, the County Board had to act within thirty ...

docket:	a-41-07
court:
decided:	2008-07-16
status:
citation:
Document Size:	142867

3 BUILDERS LEAGUE OF SOUTH JERSEY, INC. v. BURLINGTON COUNTY PLANNING BOARD, et al. -- rank: 958

... the proposed project will somehow affect county drainage facilities. Because N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.1 to - 6.13. As we noted in Kode Harbor ... of review in 2.01B is not entirely consistent with N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6 which permits review of site plans only where the ... predicated upon a determination that there was no distinction between N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.2 affords a wider jurisdiction over subdivisions than with respect ... different from its jurisdiction over site plans. As we noted, N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.2 sets out two bases for jurisdiction over subdivisions: first ... easements" to deal with storm water under certain specified conditions. N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.2a. However, subsection (c) deals with an entirely separate problem ... and physical improvements are required by the county planning board," N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.2c (emphasis added); in such cases the improvements "shall ...

docket:	a3654-00
court:	njappellate
decided:	2002-07-02
status:	published
citation:	353 N.J. Super. 4
Document Size:	45340

4 SOUTH PLAINFIELD PROPERTIES, L.P. v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PLANNING BOARD -- rank: 894

... granted its approval, pursuant to the automatic approval provision of N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7 and Middlesex County Site Plan Resolution § 11-5, to ... than that of a municipal board, and is governed by N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.1 to -6.13. Specifically, subdivision review and approval is governed by N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.2 to -6.5; site plan review and approval by N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6 to -6.7. See generally Builders League of S ... Planning Bd. , 353 N.J. Super. 4 , (App. Div. 2002). N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7 provides: The municipal or other local agency or individual ... be extended for an additional 30-day period. [Emphasis added.] N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.3 similarly provides that where county approval of a ...

docket:	A2073-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2004-10-20
status:	published
citation:	372 N.J. Super. 410 859 A.2d 463
Document Size:	34210

5 ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT GROUP L.L.C v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF NORTH BERGEN -- rank: 871

... its administrative remedies before seeking judicial review in violation of N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.9 and Rule 4:69-5. We note, however, that ... the Freeholder Board rejected the appeal as untimely under both N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.9 and Section V(F)(1) of the Hudson County ... s decision to the Freeholder Board had been untimely under N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.9 and, thus, the Freeholder Board had correctly refused to ... timely filed under Rule 4:69-6(c); (2) under N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.9, plaintiff was not required to appeal the Hudson County ... Board's decision to the Freeholder Board within ten days. N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.9 provides in pertinent part: Any person aggrieved by the ... the date of notice by certified mail of said action . [ N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.9 (emphasis added).] The statute does not define who ...

docket:	a4576-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-05-13
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	32857

6 SHIPYARD ASSOCIATES, L.P. v. HOBOKEN PLANNING BOARD -- rank: 713

... efficient county road system," including drainage issues affecting county roads. N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6, -6.6(e). See Kode Harbor Dev. Assocs. v ... land development along county roads or affecting county drainage facilities." N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6. Its review is "limited for the purpose of assuring ... Board has authority to review the County Board's decision. N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.9. Neither of those two entities is participating in these ...

docket:	a4504-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-08-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38629

7 EAST/WEST VENTURE V. BORO OF FORT LEE -- rank: 646

... the approval process since lot 2C abuts two County roads. N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.2c. The record does not establish one way or the ...

docket:	a736-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-01-05
status:	published
citation:	286 N.J.Super. 311
Document Size:	55051

8 EDWARD BOJEKIAN AND FLORENCE BOJEKIAN V. FORT LEE PLANNING BOARD -- rank: 646

... the approval process since lot 2C abuts two County roads. N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.2c. The record does not establish one way or the ...

docket:	a737-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-01-05
status:	published
citation:	286 N.J.Super. 311
Document Size:	55078

9 TOLL BROS., INC. et al. v. CREEK, L.P. -- rank: 629

... engineer for the safety and convenience of the traveling public. N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.2(c)(subdivisions); 353 N.J. Super. 4, 13-19 ... N.J. Super. 430 , 438-41 (App. Div. 1989) (interpreting N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6 to mean "county planning board has jurisdiction to review ... App. Div.), certif. denied , 185 N.J. 266 (2005); and N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6 (authorizing county planning boards to impose off-tract obligations ...

docket:	a4816-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-09-18
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	111813

10 TOLL BROS., INC. et al. v. CREEK, L.P. -- rank: 629

docket:	a6884-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-09-18
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	111813

11 TOLL BROS., INC. et al. v. CREEK, L.P. -- rank: 629

docket:	a4814-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-09-18
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	111813

12 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a2040-14.opn.html -- rank: 593

... in enacting the MLUL and the CPA [County Planning Act, N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7], the Legislature has made a value judgment that expeditious ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	40038

13 E-Z AUTO SERVICE INC. v. MAYOR AND TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF PLUMSTED, et al. -- rank: 590

... required because the development is situated along two county roads. N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6. Site plan review and approval by the County Planning ...

docket:	a4853-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-06-19
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	82991

14 S. DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. v. TOWNSHIP OF LYNDHURST ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT -- rank: 568

... the issuance of any building permits to the plaintiffs. Citing N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7, DPED informed the construction official that he could not ... that no building permit be issued and the provisions of N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7, which require deferral of the issuance of a building ... directive or an order for the purposes of this statute. N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7 does, as SDC argues, require the deferral of a ... not issued until September 2005. Once the time limit of N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.7 had been exceeded, SDC should have sought a declaration ...

docket:	a2925-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-03-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40897

15 MILLBURN TOWNSHIP v. SHORT HILLS ASSOCIATES/ TAUBMAN CO. -- rank: 545

... ordinance with the County Planning Board is the Municipal Clerk. N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.10; N.J.S.A. 40:55D-16; see also ... zoning ordinances of all the municipalities in the county.ā€¯ N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.10. The effective date of a zoning ordinance is tied ...

docket:	04430-06
court:
decided:	2007-02-06
status:
citation:
Document Size:	29645

Page:1 2 Next 6