Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 BUILDERS LEAGUE OF SOUTH JERSEY, INC. v. BURLINGTON COUNTY PLANNING BOARD, et al. -- rank: 1000

... of review in 2.01B is not entirely consistent with N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6 which permits review of site plans only where the land ... hese standards shall be limited to" and lists those limitations. N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6 provides that the review of site plans "shall be in ... five requirements, none of which deal with approval durations, while N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6 states that "procedures and standards shall be limited to" and ...

docket:	a3654-00
court:	njappellate
decided:	2002-07-02
status:	published
citation:	353 N.J. Super. 4
Document Size:	45340

2 SOUTH PLAINFIELD PROPERTIES, L.P. v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PLANNING BOARD -- rank: 891

... 2 to -6.5; site plan review and approval by N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6 to -6.7. See generally Builders League of S. Jersey ...

docket:	A2073-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2004-10-20
status:	published
citation:	372 N.J. Super. 410 859 A.2d 463
Document Size:	34210

3 SHIPYARD ASSOCIATES, L.P. v. HOBOKEN PLANNING BOARD -- rank: 686

... efficient county road system," including drainage issues affecting county roads. N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6, -6.6(e). See Kode Harbor Dev. Assocs. v. Cty ... land development along county roads or affecting county drainage facilities." N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6. Its review is "limited for the purpose of assuring a ...

docket:	a4504-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-08-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38629

4 TOLL BROS., INC. et al. v. CREEK, L.P. -- rank: 599

... N.J. Super. 430 , 438-41 (App. Div. 1989) (interpreting N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6 to mean "county planning board has jurisdiction to review site ... App. Div.), certif. denied , 185 N.J. 266 (2005); and N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6 (authorizing county planning boards to impose off-tract obligations on ...

docket:	a6884-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-09-18
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	111813

5 TOLL BROS., INC. et al. v. CREEK, L.P. -- rank: 599

... N.J. Super. 430 , 438-41 (App. Div. 1989) (interpreting N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6 to mean "county planning board has jurisdiction to review site ... App. Div.), certif. denied , 185 N.J. 266 (2005); and N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6 (authorizing county planning boards to impose off-tract obligations on ...

docket:	a4816-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-09-18
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	111813

6 TOLL BROS., INC. et al. v. CREEK, L.P. -- rank: 599

... N.J. Super. 430 , 438-41 (App. Div. 1989) (interpreting N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6 to mean "county planning board has jurisdiction to review site ... App. Div.), certif. denied , 185 N.J. 266 (2005); and N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6 (authorizing county planning boards to impose off-tract obligations on ...

docket:	a4814-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-09-18
status:	published
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	111813

7 E-Z AUTO SERVICE INC. v. MAYOR AND TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE FOR THE TOWNSHIP OF PLUMSTED, et al. -- rank: 580

... required because the development is situated along two county roads. N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6. Site plan review and approval by the County Planning Board ...

docket:	a4853-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-06-19
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	82991

8 THE RIDGE AT SADDLE RIVER, L.L.C. v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF SADDLE RIVER -- rank: 497

... application was granted. Nevertheless, it was conditioned, as required by N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6, on approval by the Bergen County Planning Board. Apparently, as ... has approval jurisdiction over any site plan involving county roads. N.J.S.A. 40:27-6.6 to -6.13. Judge Harris resolved this issue thusly: I ...

docket:	A2630-05
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-04-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34483