Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 SEVELL'S AUTO BODY CO INC v. BOROUGH OF ROSELLE PARK -- rank: 1000

... the Borough argues that plaintiff's fees are limited by N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50, which sets out the "fees to be paid to an ... The trial court accepted the Borough's argument, holding that N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50 limits the payment due to a tow operator when an ... other towing company approved in the resolution, the Borough follows N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50, which establishes the following fee schedule: All fees to be ... of unpaid storage fees for eight other vehicles. Relying on N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50, the Borough provided purchase orders totaling $1,520 for the ... interplay between N.J.S.A. 39:10A-5 and N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50. We have previously examined this issue and stated, unequivocally, that ... answered the second question raised in this appeal. In adopting N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50, the Legislature intended to protect municipalities from being charged " ...

docket:	a2899-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-02-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25119

2 GEORGE HARVEY v. TOWNSHIP OF DEPTFORD -- rank: 923

... amount of $98,705. Harvey argues that the judge misapplied N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50 to limit his damages on a per vehicle basis, and ... for storage costs. In particular, Deptford argued that pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50, plaintiff's recovery was limited to $400 per vehicle stored ... of $98,705. This appeal ensued. II. Plaintiff contends that N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50 limits the amount that a municipality is obligated to pay ... the fees charged for storage following removal in accordance with [ N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50 provides in pertinent part, All fees to be paid to ... recovery. The essential argument plaintiff raises, however, is unrelated to N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50. Plaintiff contends that he should be able to pursue a ... of action to plaintiff, and, given our discussion above regarding N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50, doing so is inconsistent with the Legislature's otherwise ...

docket:	a3187-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-08-08
status:	published
citation:	402 N.J.Super. 156 952 A.2d 115
Document Size:	53502

3 NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. HELMRICH TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, INC. -- rank: 867

... certif. denied , 197 N.J. 16 (2008), it contended that N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50 limited the fees that defendant could charge a governmental entity ... S.A. 40:48-2.54.] Defendant argued that, because N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50 capped fees that may be charged a governmental entity, the ... record, the owner's name is also spelled "Reigel." 3 N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50 provides: All fees to be paid to an operator by ...

docket:	a1590-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-12-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34982

4 MILE SQUARE TOWING LLC v. CITY OF HOBOKEN -- rank: 815

... the fees charged for storage following removal in accordance with [ N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50], fees charged for such removal , notice requirements therefor, and the ...

docket:	a6104-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-06-13
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53556

5 RICHARD DEMARCO v. TOWNSHIP OF PISCATAWAY -- rank: 682

... of Local Government Services in the Department of Community Affairs. [ N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50.] Such fee limits, however, pertain to municipal charges and do ...

docket:	a3904-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2009-07-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	55757

6 MIDLANTIC BANK V. JOSEPH M. WOOD, ET ALS -- rank: 409

... appeals, contending that its liability is limited to $400 under N.J.S.A. 40:48-2.50 and that the court erred in concluding that "payment should ...

docket:	a2852-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-06-23
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	13009