Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 EASTAMPTON CENTER, LLC v. THE PLANNING BOARD TOWNSHIP OF EASTAMPTON et al. -- rank: 1000

... 16-2.2 at 353 (2002) (hereinafter "Cox") (referring to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1 and -45.2). See generally N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1 to -45.8, enacted by L. 1987, c. 129; see ...

docket:	A1172-00
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2002-08-20
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	81650

2 ALFIERI-OLD BRIDGE ASSOCIATES, LLC. v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OLD BRIDGE -- rank: 979

... boards to evaluate proposals for general development plans. That amendment, N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1, was adopted in May 1987. It provides, in relevant part ... The Board of Adjustment has argued that the adoption of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1 in May 1987 nullified the GDP approval obtained in this ... the Township Planning Board. However, the Legislature did not require N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1 to have retrospective effect. To the contrary, the historical notes accompanying the codified version of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1 make clear that the new statute would be "effective May ... the legal impact of the Legislature's intervening enactment of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1 in May 1987 on the GDP in this matter. We ... law in September 1985, and that the subsequent enactment of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1 did not vitiate that approval. In this vein, we ...

docket:	A1644-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-10-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	70327

3 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3793-12a-1886-13.opn.html -- rank: 964

... concluded that, because "the [B]oard had the power under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1(b) to extend the plan by ten years, [she] need ... whether . . . the complaint is time barred." The judge reasoned that N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1(b), which permits a planning board to authorize a GDP ... separate challenges to the March 2013 order. It contends that N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1(b) does not preempt a local municipal governing body from ... by the planning board notwithstanding any provisions of [the MLUL] ." N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1(a) (emphasis added). N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1(b) provides: The term of the effect of the [GDP ... conditions which the planning board attaches to the approval thereof ." N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1(c) (emphasis added). These provisions were part of comprehensive ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	56366

4 ALFIERI-OLD BRIDGE ASSOCIATES LLC v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OLD BRIDGE -- rank: 934

... slip op. at 17. However, given the subsequent adoption of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1, in May 1987, entrusting the approval of GDPs to planning ... question of whether the maximum twenty-year vesting period under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1 should be equitably tolled here because of the time the ... with both the Township's current zoning ordinance and also N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1 to -45.8. The GDP was not exempt from these ... its plan prior to May 28, 1987 (the date that N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1 was adopted). The judge also concluded that the Planning Board ...

docket:	a2195-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	71872

5 MOUNTAIN HILL, L.L.C Cross- v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN -- rank: 892

... the statute. Legislative use is consistent with this interpretation. See N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1. 3 Defendant does not dispute that Mercantante drafted the Development ...

docket:	a5871-04
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-09-10
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	106666

6 MOUNTAIN HILL, L.L.C Cross- v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN -- rank: 892

... the statute. Legislative use is consistent with this interpretation. See N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1. 3 Defendant does not dispute that Mercantante drafted the Development ...

docket:	a5496-04
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-09-10
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	106666

7 FRANK PAGANO v. WOOLWICH TOWNSHIP JOINT LAND USE BOARD -- rank: 871

... by the planning board notwithstanding any provisions of [the MLUL]." N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1(a). N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1(b) provides that "the term of the effect of the ... long its approval of a GDP will have legal effect. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1(b). However, this discretion is not unfettered, as there is ... final approval of the first section of the planned development . . . ." N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1(b). The MLUL defines "final approval" as the official action ... of the phases had reached a point of "final approval[.]" N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1(b). Moreover, a developer may seek to modify the proposed ...

docket:	a4432-13
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-08-07
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	37134

8 CITIZENS UNITED TO PROTECT THE MAURICE RIVER AND ITS TRIBUTARIES, INC., et al. v. CITY OF MILLVILLE PLANNING BOARD et al. -- rank: 811

... 4. The applicable substantive provisions for GDPs are codified at N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1 to -45.8. A GDP must set forth the permitted ...

docket:	a4204-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-08-06
status:	published
citation:	395 N.J. Super. 434
Document Size:	42384

9 RACCOON CREEK GROUP LLC v. CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER -- rank: 779

... Planning Board for general development plan (GDP) approval pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1 to -45.8. Specifically, Raccoon Creek sought GDP approval for ...

docket:	a4029-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	48497

10 RIYA CRANBURY HOTEL LLC v. PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANBURY -- rank: 507

... variance was not required. As such, and by virtue of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.1, jurisdiction was properly vested in the Board. In Point II ...

docket:	a0876-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35394