Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 40:55d-46")   1 to 14 of 14 results. Run time: 0.828 seconds | Search time: 0.821 seconds    
1 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a2040-14.opn.html -- rank: 1000
... BV), approval of a construction site plan application, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46(c). We affirm. We recite the following facts as those ... failure to timely act on the Application in accordance with N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46(c), automatic approval was the appropriate remedy. The judge held ... within [ninety-five] days of the date of such submission." N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46(c). If no determination is made within ninety-five days ... to include the necessary documentation for the approval time under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46(c) to trigger the timeframe. N.J.S.A. 40 ... argues that the court erred by granting automatic approval under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46(c) because the Board did not have jurisdiction over the ... referral to the Board for approval or denial pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46(c). As such, VVPA's argument that the Board ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 40038
2 Amerada Hess Corporation n/k/a Hess Corporation v. Burlington County Planning Board -- rank: 930
... included several strict timetables for approval decisions. See, e.g. , N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46 (45 days for municipal review of site plan application for ... applicant.” N.J.S.A. 40:55D-45.3; N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46.1(a); N.J.S.A. 40:55D-47; N ... time as may be consented to by the applicant.” N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46.1(a). The Legislature obviously knew how to provide temporal ...
docket: a-41-07
court:
decided: 2008-07-16
status:
citation: 195 N.J. 616
Document Size: 109343
3 AB MONMOUTH, L.L.C. v. TOWNSHIP OF WALL PLANNING BOARD -- rank: 871
... 3 ("'Applicant' means a developer submitting an application for development"); N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46, "Procedure for preliminary site plan approval" ("requir[ing] that the ...
docket: a1099-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-10-06
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 32501
4 NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS v. TOWNSHIP COUNCIL TOWNSHIP OF EDISON -- rank: 846
... subsection a." Thus, the 200-foot rule applies. See also N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46.1 (using the phrase "[a]n ordinance requiring notice, pursuant ...
docket: a6490-03
court: njappellate
decided: 2006-02-02
status: published
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 31787
5 LARRY PRICE v. MARTIN T. MARTINETTI -- rank: 794
... review involves first preliminary and later final site plan approval, N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46, -50, the MLUL allows a municipality to combine this two ...
docket: a1834-10
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-07-25
status: published
citation: 421 N.J. Super. 290 23 A.3d 483
Document Size: 31294
6 FREDERICK WATERS V. TWP OF GALLOWAY -- rank: 780
... plan must be reviewed in two stages, preliminary and final. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46, -50. It is the local ordinance which prescribes the classification ... the process for preliminary and final site plan review. See N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46, -50. Plaintiffs' proposed upgrade of their mobile home park fell ...
docket: a1244-93
court: njappellate
decided: 1995-12-27
status: published published
citation: 286 N.J.Super. 222
Document Size: 49766
7 JAMES L. LAMBERT v. BOROUGH OF BEACH HAVEN -- rank: 739
... the outcome.' We disagree. With respect to site plan approval, N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46(a) provides that '[a]n ordinance requiring site plan review ... preliminary site plan approval have been met.' Then, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46(b), '[t]he planning board shall, if the proposed development ...
docket: a0555-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-04-27
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 44048
8 EASTAMPTON CENTER, LLC v. THE PLANNING BOARD TOWNSHIP OF EASTAMPTON et al. -- rank: 739
... the [95 day] time period" for acting on the application. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46.1c, -49.3c & d. Our research reveals virtually no cases ...
docket: A1172-00
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2002-08-20
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 81650
9 Amerada Hess Corporation n/k/a Hess Corporation v. Burlington County Planning Board -- rank: 732
... or grant approval of the application subject to county approval. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46 (45 days for municipal review of site plan application for ...
docket: a-41-07
court:
decided: 2008-07-16
status:
citation:
Document Size: 142867
10 OCEAN REEF CONDO, LLC v. HADDAD 228 LONG BRANCH LLC -- rank: 648
... plan approval, a public hearing was not needed or conducted. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46.1. 5 Notably, the terms "use" and "structure" are separately ...
docket: a2119-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-03-06
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 33635
11 W.L. GOODFELLOWS et al. v. WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD -- rank: 604
... Board's denial of its application violated the provisions of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46 and the judge erred in dismissing plaintiff's claims for ...
docket: A2744-00
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2001-11-14
status: published
citation: 345 N.J. Super. 109 783 A.2d 750
Document Size: 24588
12 MONMOUTH COMMERCE CENTER, LLC v. HOWELL TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD -- rank: 571
... pertinent, the zoning ordinances.' Ibid. 'To accomplish this legislative intent, N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46[(b)] specifically provides that '[t]he planning board shall, if ...
docket: a0012-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-05-12
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 32837
13 RENAISSANCE PLAZA ASSOCIATES, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, Defendant. -- rank: 534
... in order to apply for a land use variance under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46. The statute defines "developers," i.e., applicants for variances before ...
docket: 00143-97
court:
decided: 1998-01-26
status:
citation: 18 N.J. Tax 342
Document Size: 99363
14 FRANK'S REALTY COMPANY v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF VINELAND -- rank: 531
... required in tentative form for discussion purposes for preliminary approval. [N.J.S.A. 40:55D-46(a).] Thus, '[m]odifications from the preliminary plans to the ...
docket: a2842-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-03-17
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23030

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!