Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 40:55d-55")   1 to 10 of 10 results. Run time: 0.833 seconds | Search time: 0.826 seconds    
1 KATHERINE NEWMARK v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MENDHAM -- rank: 1000
... Rule 1:10-3 was appropriate. The Board argued that N.J.S.A. 40:55D-55 (or "statute") "confers upon the municipality the right, but not ... or may not run based upon the notice provisions of [ N.J.S.A. ] 40:55D-55." Following oral argument, the court issued its ruling from the bench, finding that although the $1000 fine provided in N.J.S.A. 40:55D-55 was mandatory, the time limitation also set forth in the ... forward and said to the Town, you must perform under [ N.J.S.A. 40:55D-55]. For whatever reason, that didn't happen, even though you ... issued October 23, 2009. We add the following comments. Under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-55, an individual who "transfers or sells or agrees to transfer ... the subject of a sale or transfer in violation of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-55 "may be deemed a separate violation" and therefore may ...
docket: a1617-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-08-25
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 26916
2 JEROME MASON v. TOWNSHIP OF MIDDLETOWN ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT -- rank: 688
... can be rescinded by timely action of the municipality. See N.J.S.A. 40:55D-55. Although the Township had the right to challenge the estate ... civil action to enjoin or set aside an illegal conveyance. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-55. Moreover, when plaintiff was notified in 1 Plaintiff sued his ... separate sales of his Lot 16 and Lot 9. Under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-55, a municipality's action to void a conveyance that causes ...
docket: a0133-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2022-08-10
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 30132
3 Simonson v. Z Cranbury Associates -- rank: 570
... or separately convey that parcel without an approved subdivision. See N.J.S.A. 40:55D-55 (prohibiting conveyances of property not lawfully subdivided). Also, from the ...
docket: a-36-96
court: njsupreme
decided: 1997-06-04
status:
citation: 143 N.J. 379
Document Size: 70957
4 KIKIS A. KYRIACOU v. JAMES LAVIN -- rank: 551
... 233 N.J. Super. 587 , 596 (App. Div. 1989) (discussing N.J.S.A. 40:55D-55. The municipality may also file a civil suit for injunctive ...
docket: a1647-06
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-07-24
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 44049
5 DENNIS M. SCARDIGLI, M.D., VS BOROUGH OF HADDONFIELD ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, ET AL -- rank: 520
... proceeding without a transcript of the final board meeting violated N.J.S.A. 40:55D-55 has passed. That circumstance evidences the official municipal view that ...
docket: a4686-95
court: njappellate
decided: 1997-04-30
status: published
citation: 300 N.J.Super. 314
Document Size: 22138
6 WILLIAM HNATT v. PATRICIA GANT -- rank: 513
... lot 15, defendants applied to the Board for variances under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-55 to invalidate a transfer of Lot 15 when it was ...
docket: a1743-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-11-13
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 49880
7 CHRISTOPHER SIMEONE et al. -- rank: 501
... file a complaint to set aside the conveyance pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-55 as official recognition of the separate nature of each lot ...
docket: A0785-03
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2005-02-17
status: published
citation: 377 N.J. Super. 417 873 A.2d 571
Document Size: 22284
8 MARIE B. FOX, ROBERT L. KELLER et al. v. TOWNSHIP OF WEST MILFORD, -- rank: 494
... of a single tract without first obtaining subdivision approval. Thus N.J.S.A. 40:55D-55 imposes a monetary penalty of up to $1,000 for ...
docket: A2858-00
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2003-01-22
status: published
citation: 357 N.J. Super. 123 814 A.2d 637
Document Size: 19381
9 JOSEPH PANETTA v. EQUITY ONE, INC. -- rank: 460
... permitted them to illegally subdivide the two "parcels" contrary to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-55 and Fox v. Tp. of West Milford , 357 N.J ...
docket: a6813-03
court: njappellate
decided: 2005-06-15
status: published
citation: 378 N.J. Super. 298
Document Size: 107052
10 CRAIG H. TAYLOR HOLDINGS L.L.C. v. THE TOWNSHIP OF PITTSGROVE -- rank: 452
... Lot 9.01 within the two-year period required by N.J.S.A. 40:55D-55, it is equitably estopped from asserting that plaintiff is not ...
docket: a6335-07
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2009-07-17
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 45308

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!