Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 HACKENSACK RIVERKEEPER v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION -- rank: 1000

... presumption that the municipal development regulations are no longer reasonable." N.J.S.A. 40:55D-89.1. We express substantial doubt that those provisions of the Rules ...

docket:	a1752-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-12-22
status:	published
citation:	443 N.J.Super. 293 128 A.3d 749
Document Size:	63519

2 CARL VIDAL VS LISANTI FOODS, INC., ET AL -- rank: 882

... the last such reexamination, as required by See footnote 4 N.J.S.A. 40:55D-89.1 provides that the planning board's failure to conduct a ...

docket:	a452-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-07-26
status:	published
citation:	292 N.J.Super. 555
Document Size:	33739

3 INTERVINE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING INC V. CITY OF GLOUCESTER CITY ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT AND CITY OF GLOUCESTER CITY -- rank: 651

... to overcome the statutory rebuttable presumption of unreasonableness required by N.J.S.A. 40:55D-89.1. The rebuttable presumption of unreasonableness having been overcome, the presumption ...

docket:	a5193-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-05-02
status:	published
citation:	290 N.J.Super. 78
Document Size:	22864

4 ALAN WILLOUGHBY, WILLIAM H. REESE, SR. et al. v. THE WOLFSON GROUP, INC., -- rank: 501

... defines the mandatory and optional elements of a master plan. N.J.S.A. 40:55D-89.1 provides that the planning board's failure to adopt a ...

docket:	a3593-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-06-23
status:	published
citation:	332 N.J.Super. 223
Document Size:	12196