1 Results for [("N.J.S.A. 40a:10-1")]

Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

Results for ("N.J.S.A. 40a:10-1") 1 to 1 of 1 results.

Run time: 0.685 seconds | Search time: 0.678 seconds

1 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 ESMAY PARCHMENT v. CITY -- rank: 1000

... attorneys disserved the officers' interests and favored the City. Citing N.J.S.A. 40A:10-1, Judge Rothschild explained that the City was permitted, but not ...

docket:	a3150-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-07-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38437