Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Statewide Insurance Fund v. Star Insurance Company -- rank: 1000

... complying with N.J.S.A. 40A:10-36. In N.J.S.A. 40A:10- 48, the Legislature directly states that “[a] [JIF] established pursuant ... pooling, and courts in the jurisdictions with statutes comparable to N.J.S.A. 40A:10-48 have applied those statutes in accordance with their express terms. Applying the clear and plain terms of N.J.S.A. 40A:10-48, the Court holds that JIFs cannot insure members; instead, JIFs ... through “self-insurance.” Under the plain language of N.J.S.A. 40A:10-48, a JIF “is not an insurance company or an ... complied with N.J.S.A. 40A:10-36. In N.J.S.A. 40A:10-48, the Legislature directly addressed whether JIFs are considered insurance companies ... from regulatory provisions in Code sections devoted to insurance. See N.J.S.A. 40A:10-48. That comports with the legal landscape nationally. New Jersey’ ...

docket:	a-62-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-02-16
status:
citation:
Document Size:	37457

2 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4148-19.opn.html -- rank: 881

... A-4148-19 4 Star first argues the court misinterpreted N.J.S.A. 40A:10-48. In doing so, Star offers an erroneous reading of the ... against Statewide, and by extension, Long Branch, being self-insured. N.J.S.A. 40A:10- 48, however, provides: A joint insurance fund established pursuant to the ... New Jersey. According to Star, then, under one interpretation of N.J.S.A. 40A:10- -48, JIFs provide insurance to their members but are not subject ... an[d] unambiguous language of the relevant statu[t]es. N.J.S.A. 40A:10-48 undeniably states that joint insurance funds are not insurance companies ... supplemented the language contained in the enabling statute and/or N.J.S.A. 40A:10-48 by specifically including such language in the legislation. However, they ... S.A. 40A:10-36 [to -51], and/or specifically N.J.S.A. 40A:10-48. Nor should this [c]ourt engage in conjecture or ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	26255

3 IRA D. SHAPIRO, D.C., ET ALS VS MIDDLESEX COUNTY MUNICIPAL JOINT INSURANCE FUND, ET ALS -- rank: 559

... S.Ct. 56 , 54 L.Ed.2d 73 (1977). ����While N.J.S.A. 40A:10-48 states that a joint insurance fund is not technically an ...

docket:	a2399-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-01-20
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	25285

4 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 ESMAY PARCHMENT v. CITY -- rank: 521

... the fund is not an insurance company or an insurer, N.J.S.A. 40A:10-48, its "activities are subject to like regulation by the Commissioner ...

docket:	a3150-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-07-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38437