Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Jen Electric, Inc. v. County of Essex -- rank: 1000

... issue in this appeal is whether the 2000 amendment to N.J.S.A 40A:11-13(e) limits the standing of those who wish to challenge ... until the specifications were revised. The trial court determined that N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13(e) provides the relevant requirements for standing and allows only ... 196 N.J. 344 (2008). HELD : The 2000 amendment to N.J.S.A 40A:11-13(e) is intended as a statute of limitations for bid ... issued by the County. 1. In 2000, the Legislature amended N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13(e) to provide that “any prospective bidder who wishes ... a bid specification must be prosecuted. (pp. 17-21) 2. N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13(e) limits the actions of “prospective bidders.” The ... “bidders” yet; there are only “prospective bidders.” N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13(e) provides only a time-bar by which to ...

docket:	a-23-08
court:
decided:	2009-03-04
status:
citation:	197 N.J. 627
Document Size:	91385

2 A&A INDUSTRIAL PIPING, INC v. COUNTY OF PASSAIC -- rank: 700

... rejection of previously received bids and a re-bid under N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2(d). "A municipality has a well-recognized right to ... Girt Bd. of Adj. , 45 N.J. 268 , 296 (1965)). N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2(d) provides that a public entity is permitted to ... requirement, and is therefore neither "substantial" nor a "revision" under N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2(d). N.J.S.A. 40A:11-16(a ... performed by either a prime or subcontractor without DPMC certification. N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2d permits a contracting unit to reject all bids if ...

docket:	a4902-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30716

3 SUBURBAN DISPOSAL, INC. v. CITY OF CAMDEN -- rank: 694

... forty-five-day rule, R. 4:69-6(a), and N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13, which permits a challenge to the specifications only prior to ... solid waste collection contracts, and the Local Public Contracts Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13, require that bid specifications for municipal solid waste contracts "shall ...

docket:	a3236-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-07-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35916

4 ALASKA SERVICES, INC. v. COUNTY OF MORRIS, ET AL. -- rank: 665

... waive immaterial formalities." No objections to the specifications were filed. N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13. Only plaintiff, Sodexho, and Healthcare Services Group, Inc. provided submissions ...

docket:	A0371-06
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2007-08-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45245

5 DOBCO, INC v. BERGEN COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY -- rank: 665

... on the contracting unit or the award of a contract.' N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13; see also Jen Elec., Inc. v. Cnty. of Essex, 197 N.J. 627, 631 (2009) (construing N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13 to be 'a statute of limitations' but otherwise not 'restrict ... does not rely on the statute of limitations contained in N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13. The decision in Autotote, Ltd. v. New Jersey Sports & Exposition ...

docket:	a2201-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-07-08
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	64119

6 Borough of Princeton v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Mercer -- rank: 641

... bidding, including requirements relating to the drafting of bid specifications, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13, and to the contracting unit's determination of which bid ...

docket:	a-42-00
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2001-07-23
status:
citation:	169 N.J. 135
Document Size:	75407

7 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF NEW JERSEY INC v. MERCER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY -- rank: 604

... no later than three days prior to the bid opening. N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13. Republic, however, is not challenging the bid specifications. It claims ...

docket:	a2287-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-11-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	81618

8 UNITED SERVICES, INC v. CITY OF NEWARK -- rank: 604

... requisite to the efficient and economical performance of the contract." N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13(b). Although this residency requirement has apparently been removed from ... trial to prove that the specification did not meet the N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13(b) requirement, and was included in the initial RFP in ... reject USI's bid without justification. It is not. See N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2 (defining those circumstances whereby the contracting unit may reject ...

docket:	a2117-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24329

9 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2312-12xx.opn.html -- rank: 604

... no later than three days prior to the bid opening. N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13. Republic, however, is not challenging the bid specifications. It claims ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	80633

10 TORMEE CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. MERCER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY -- rank: 594

... performance of the public work. The Local Public Contracts Law, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13, provides that ��������specifications for an acquisition under this act, whether ...

docket:	a-55-95
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1996-02-06
status:
citation:	143 N.J. 143
Document Size:	62107

11 VISITING HOMEMAKER SERVICE OF HUDSON COUNTY v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF HUDSON -- rank: 583

... purpose, function or activity for which the contract is awarded . . . ." N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13. Plaintiff, however, reserved its right to future challenges to the ...

docket:	A3180-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-10-07
status:	published
citation:	380 N.J. Super. 596 883 A.2d 107
Document Size:	86217

12 SUBURBAN DISPOSAL, INC. VS. CITY OF PATERSON, ET AL. -- rank: 578

... when the decision was made to reject plaintiff's bid. N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2(b) provides '[a] contracting unit may reject all bids ...

docket:	a0519-23
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-03-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29136

13 SUBURBAN DISPOSAL INC v. BOROUGH OF CHATHAM -- rank: 572

... as a result, the bids would be rejected pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2(e). On November 1, 2010, Chatham notified potential contractors ... s action. In reaching his decision, the judge noted that N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2e permits a governing body to reject all bids if ... cost estimates or appropriations for the services, processes permitted by N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2a and b. We strongly disapprove of Chatham's conduct ...

docket:	a1482-10
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-02-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30281

14 DELAWARE RIVER JOINT TOLL BRIDGE COMMISSION v. GEORGE HARMS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. -- rank: 564

... did not 'encourage free, open and competitive bidding.' Ibid. (quoting N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13). The Court also considered a PLA in Tormee Constr., Inc ...

docket:	a1484-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-04-04
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	101584

15 GEORGE HARMS CONSTRUCTION CO. V. NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY -- rank: 551

... in a manner to encourage free, open and competitive bidding," N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13, the current expression of State policy for public entities such ...

docket:	a-113-93
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1994-07-07
status:
citation:	137 N.J. 8
Document Size:	119992