Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 A&A INDUSTRIAL PIPING, INC v. COUNTY OF PASSAIC -- rank: 1000

... rejection of previously received bids and a re-bid under N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2(d). "A municipality has a well-recognized right to reject ... Girt Bd. of Adj. , 45 N.J. 268 , 296 (1965)). N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2(d) provides that a public entity is permitted to reject ... requirement, and is therefore neither "substantial" nor a "revision" under N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2(d). N.J.S.A. 40A:11-16(a) does ...

docket:	a4902-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-04-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30716

2 SUBURBAN DISPOSAL, INC. VS. CITY OF PATERSON, ET AL. -- rank: 888

... when the decision was made to reject plaintiff's bid. N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2(b) provides '[a] contracting unit may reject all bids . . . [when ...

docket:	a0519-23
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-03-27
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29136

3 SUBURBAN DISPOSAL INC v. BOROUGH OF CHATHAM -- rank: 840

... as a result, the bids would be rejected pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2(e). On November 1, 2010, Chatham notified potential contractors that ...

docket:	a1482-10
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-02-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30281

4 UNITED SERVICES, INC v. CITY OF NEWARK -- rank: 781

... reject USI's bid without justification. It is not. See N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2 (defining those circumstances whereby the contracting unit may reject all ...

docket:	a2117-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24329

5 CETCO CONTRACTING SERVICES COMPANY v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY -- rank: 766

... the "purposes or provisions" of the LPCL are being violated. N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2(c), (d) and (e). Here, the trial court found that ...

docket:	a6116-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25316

6 CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS L.L.C v. COUNTY OF HUDSON -- rank: 659

... contract pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 40A:11-12]. [ N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2.] Although the right to reject all bids "serves an important ...

docket:	a3943-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-07-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44874

7 CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC. v. COUNTY OF ESSEX -- rank: 555

... the rejection of all proposals pursuant to the provisions of [ N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2(d)]. On October 10, 2007, the Board of Freeholders accepted ...

docket:	a2577-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-01-25
status:	published
citation:	411 N.J. Super. 378 986 A.2d 695
Document Size:	52237

8 A&A INDUSTRIAL PIPING, INC v. COUNTY OF PASSAIC and KAPPA CONSTRUCTION CORP - -- rank: 499

... this contract constituted a substantial revision of the specifications under N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13.2(d), entitling it to reject all bids in the last ...

docket:	a0978-12
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	18314