Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 THE DRS GROUP, TRACY A. MAR -- rank: 1000

... of document image scanning services. Plaintiff claimed the award violated N.J.S.A. 40A:11-24(a) because defendant's contract bid expired prior to the ... to submit bids by April 16, 2015. In accordance with N.J.S.A. 40A:11-24(a), the invitation stated the County "shall award the contract ... to the June 15, 2015 expiration date as required under N.J.S.A. 40A:11-24(a). The judge first determined there was insufficient credible evidence ... consent for any specific period of time as required by N.J.S.A. 40A:11-24(a)." The judge determined the County acted in an arbitrary ... the County's award of the contract to defendant under N.J.S.A. 40A:11-24(a). See Burroughs v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of the ... 181 N.J. Super. 492 , 501 (Law Div. 1981) (holding N.J.S.A. 40A:11-24(a) requires that consent for an extension of bids ...

docket:	a3209-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-03-03
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38025

2 PORT IMPERIAL FERRY CORP., ETC. VS. MONMOUTH COUNTY, ET AL. -- rank: 811

... sixty-day extension for the bid proposal in accordance with N.J.S.A. 40A:11- 24. NY Waterway agreed to the County's request. On March ...

docket:	a0776-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-03-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30185

3 J. SMENTKOWSKI, INC v. LACEY TOWNSHIP -- rank: 763

... reject all bids within sixty days, timeframes set forth in N.J.S.A. 40A:11-24(a). Additionally, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-24(b) requires that the contract "shall be signed by all ... surety bond was conditioned only upon the requirements cited in N.J.S.A. 40A:11-24, which were applicable to all contracts publicly bid pursuant to ...

docket:	a5930-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-10-29
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	17482

4 CETCO CONTRACTING SERVICES COMPANY v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY -- rank: 738

... failed to reject all bids within the time required by N.J.S.A. 40A:11-24(a). The statute provides in pertinent part that "[t]he ... January 15, 2010. Even if the sixty-day period in N.J.S.A. 40A:11-24(a) is deemed to run from the date bids were ... inherent power to reject bids beyond the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 40A:11-24(a) because it cannot be compelled "to accept a bid ...

docket:	a6116-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-05-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25316

5 ESTATE OF HARRINGTON v. CITY OF LINDEN, -- rank: 485

... the thirty-day limit for accepting public bids pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:11-24 was construed to extend to the next business day when ...

docket:	a4113-99
court:	njappellate
decided:	2001-03-26
status:	published
citation:	338 N.J.Super. 500
Document Size:	12572

6 BODIES BY LEMBO, INC. V. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX -- rank: 437

... under certain circumstances has the right to reject all bids. N.J.S.A. 40A:11-24. This right serves an important function in that it provides ...

docket:	a7005-94
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-01-04
status:	published
citation:	286 N.J.Super. 298
Document Size:	25827