21 Results for [("N.J.S.A. 40a:11-6")]

Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

Results for ("N.J.S.A. 40a:11-6") 1 to 15 of 21 results.	Run time: 0.751 seconds \| Search time: 0.744 seconds
Page:1 2 Next 6

1 TORMEE CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. MERCER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY -- rank: 1000

... for bids "shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder." N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1. That direction guards "against favoritism, improvidence, extravagance and corruption ...

docket:	a-55-95
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1996-02-06
status:
citation:	143 N.J. 143
Document Size:	62107

2 PORT IMPERIAL FERRY CORP., ETC. VS. MONMOUTH COUNTY, ET AL. -- rank: 966

... may be awarded as an extraordinary unspecifiable service (EUS) under N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1(b) or through competitive bids under N.J.S ... contracting agent that the solicitation of competitive quotations is impracticable.' N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1(b). However, as the LPCL provides, '[t]he application ... agreement properly characterized as being an EUS is subject to N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1. Burlington Twp. v. Middle Dept. Inspection Agency, 175 N ...

docket:	a0776-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-03-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30185

3 MONTANA CONSTRUCTION CORP v. JERSEY CITY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY -- rank: 936

... lowest responsible bidder.'' Meadowbrook, 138 N.J. at 313 (quoting N.J.S.A. 40A:-11:6.1); see also N.J.S.A. 40A:11-4 ...

docket:	a3730-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-04-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53148

4 Borough of Princeton v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Mercer -- rank: 932

... the contracting unit's determination of which bid to accept. N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1. The bidding requirement applied to contracts exceeding $7,500 ...

docket:	a-42-00
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2001-07-23
status:
citation:	169 N.J. 135
Document Size:	75407

5 ERNEST BOCK SONS DOBCO PENNSAUKEN JOINT VENTURE v. TOWNSHIP OF PENNSAUKEN -- rank: 917

... Consol. Waste Servs., 138 N.J. 307, 313 (1994) (quoting N.J.S.A. 40A:11:6.1); see also N.J.S.A. 40A:11-4 ...

docket:	a3684-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-11-30
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	32645

6 NOVA CRETE, INC. v. CITY OF ELIZABETH -- rank: 804

... advertised contracts must be awarded to 'the lowest responsible bidder[,]' N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1[,]" which "has [been] interpreted . . . to mean . . . the contract must ... Crete was not the lowest responsible bidder on the project, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1, and properly awarded the contract to JOGI. The trial ...

docket:	a3211-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-01-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32374

7 NOVA CRETE, INC. v. CITY OF ELIZABETH -- rank: 804

docket:	a3550-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-01-15
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	31433

8 LENOX TOWING v. COUNTY OF BERGEN -- rank: 785

... and [we]re the highest revenue producing bids" received. Citing N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1(d), the resolution indicated that the award could be ... advertised contracts must be awarded to 'the lowest responsible bidder[,]' N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1[,]" which "has [been] interpreted . . . to mean . . . the contract must ... omissions can be the subject of waiver." Ibid. (citations omitted). N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1(d) provides: Whenever two or more responses to a ... Hackensack that the County can not invoke the provisions of N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1(d) because it had not received "two or more ... that it should be awarded the contract because, in invoking N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1(d) as justification for its award to Brookside, the ...

docket:	a6160-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-10-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42172

9 BOROUGH OF PRINCETON, a municipal corporation v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS COUNTY OF MERCER and MERCER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, -- rank: 778