Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Borough of Princeton v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Mercer -- rank: 1000

... the contracting unit's determination of which bid to accept. N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1. The bidding requirement applied to contracts exceeding $7,500, and ...

docket:	a-42-00
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2001-07-23
status:
citation:	169 N.J. 135
Document Size:	75407

2 MONTANA CONSTRUCTION CORP v. JERSEY CITY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY -- rank: 992

... lowest responsible bidder.'' Meadowbrook, 138 N.J. at 313 (quoting N.J.S.A. 40A:-11:6.1); see also N.J.S.A. 40A:11-4(a ...

docket:	a3730-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-04-15
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	53148

3 TORMEE CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. MERCER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY -- rank: 963

... for bids "shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder." N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1. That direction guards "against favoritism, improvidence, extravagance and corruption" in ...

docket:	a-55-95
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1996-02-06
status:
citation:	143 N.J. 143
Document Size:	62107

4 PORT IMPERIAL FERRY CORP., ETC. VS. MONMOUTH COUNTY, ET AL. -- rank: 959

... may be awarded as an extraordinary unspecifiable service (EUS) under N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1(b) or through competitive bids under N.J.S.A ... contracting agent that the solicitation of competitive quotations is impracticable.' N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1(b). However, as the LPCL provides, '[t]he application of ... agreement properly characterized as being an EUS is subject to N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1. Burlington Twp. v. Middle Dept. Inspection Agency, 175 N.J ...

docket:	a0776-22
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-03-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30185

5 BOROUGH OF PRINCETON, a municipal corporation v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS COUNTY OF MERCER and MERCER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, -- rank: 933

... that the contract be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1, it also exempts certain transactions from the bidding process entirely ...

docket:	a3291-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-07-31
status:	published
citation:	333 N.J.Super. 310
Document Size:	47575

6 BOROUGH OF PRINCETON, a municipal corporation v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS COUNTY OF MERCER and MERCER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, -- rank: 933

... that the contract be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1, it also exempts certain transactions from the bidding process entirely ...

docket:	a1704-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-07-31
status:	published
citation:	333 N.J.Super. 310
Document Size:	50417

7 BOROUGH OF PRINCETON, a municipal corporation v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS COUNTY OF MERCER and MERCER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, -- rank: 933

... that the contract be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1, it also exempts certain transactions from the bidding process entirely ...

docket:	a2291-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-07-31
status:	published
citation:	333 N.J.Super. 310
Document Size:	50417

8 BOROUGH OF PRINCETON, a municipal corporation v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS COUNTY OF MERCER and MERCER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, -- rank: 933

... that the contract be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1, it also exempts certain transactions from the bidding process entirely ...

docket:	a2776-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-07-31
status:	published
citation:	333 N.J.Super. 310
Document Size:	50417

9 BOROUGH OF PRINCETON, a municipal corporation v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS COUNTY OF MERCER and MERCER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, -- rank: 933

... that the contract be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1, it also exempts certain transactions from the bidding process entirely ...

docket:	a2343-97
court:	njappellate
decided:	2000-07-31
status:	published
citation:	333 N.J.Super. 310
Document Size:	50417

10 ERNEST BOCK SONS DOBCO PENNSAUKEN JOINT VENTURE v. TOWNSHIP OF PENNSAUKEN -- rank: 889

... Consol. Waste Servs., 138 N.J. 307, 313 (1994) (quoting N.J.S.A. 40A:11:6.1); see also N.J.S.A. 40A:11-4(a ...

docket:	a3684-22
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-11-30
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	32645

11 LENOX TOWING v. COUNTY OF BERGEN -- rank: 841

... and [we]re the highest revenue producing bids" received. Citing N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1(d), the resolution indicated that the award could be made ... advertised contracts must be awarded to 'the lowest responsible bidder[,]' N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1[,]" which "has [been] interpreted . . . to mean . . . the contract must be ... omissions can be the subject of waiver." Ibid. (citations omitted). N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1(d) provides: Whenever two or more responses to a request ... Hackensack that the County can not invoke the provisions of N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1(d) because it had not received "two or more responses ... that it should be awarded the contract because, in invoking N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1(d) as justification for its award to Brookside, the County ...

docket:	a6160-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-10-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	42172

12 NOVA CRETE, INC. v. CITY OF ELIZABETH -- rank: 797

... advertised contracts must be awarded to 'the lowest responsible bidder[,]' N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1[,]" which "has [been] interpreted . . . to mean . . . the contract must be ... Crete was not the lowest responsible bidder on the project, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1, and properly awarded the contract to JOGI. The trial court ...

docket:	a3211-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-01-15
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32374

13 NOVA CRETE, INC. v. CITY OF ELIZABETH -- rank: 797

... advertised contracts must be awarded to 'the lowest responsible bidder[,]' N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1[,]" which "has [been] interpreted . . . to mean . . . the contract must be ... Crete was not the lowest responsible bidder on the project, N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1, and properly awarded the contract to JOGI. The trial court ...

docket:	a3550-08
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2010-01-15
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	31433

14 SUBURBAN DISPOSAL INC v. BOROUGH OF CHATHAM -- rank: 756

... publicly advertised contracts be awarded to the "lowest responsible bidder." N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1. A low bidder can be considered the lowest responsible bidder ...

docket:	a1482-10
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-02-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30281

15 UNITED SERVICES, INC v. CITY OF NEWARK -- rank: 745

... be awarded to 'the lowest responsible bidder.'" (in turn citing N.J.S.A. 40A:11-6.1)). This right is subject only to Newark's ability to ...

docket:	a2117-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-04-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24329