Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 REALTY APPRAISAL COMPANY v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY -- rank: 1000

... states: "[i]t is important to note that pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:5-16, the City is prohibited from paying for goods or services ... is based. It is clear from the plain text of N.J.S.A. 40A:5-16 that the law is intended to guard against preemptive, anticipatory ...

docket:	a4339-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-05-17
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	80403

2 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3310-17.opn.html -- rank: 823

... a voucher detailing the claim signed by the intended payee. N.J.S.A. 40A:5-16. On August 22, 2017, one week after the August 15 ... Shirley a voucher for her signature. The Borough, bound by N.J.S.A. 40A:5-16, see Maltese v. Twp. of N. Brunswick, 353 N.J ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	22107

3 THOMAS MALTESE v. THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BRUNSWICK -- rank: 761

... paying appropriated public funds to vendors, employees or other claimants. N.J.S.A. 40A:5-16 establishes the general requirement that the governing body shall not ...

docket:	a5769-00
court:	njappellate
decided:	2002-06-20
status:	published
citation:	353 N.J. Super. 226
Document Size:	52265

4 LACEY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY VS NEW DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, ET AL -- rank: 749

... 1J-1.4; Munoz , supra , 145 N.J. at 384.      N.J.S.A. 40A:5-16 prohibits any local unit or body, such as Lacey, from ... act of the governmental agency authorizing the payment pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:5-16 and 5-17 takes place, the costs are not actually ...

docket:	a2758-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-06-04
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	44955

5 CONTRACT APPLICATORS INC v. BOROUGH OF PARK RIDGE -- rank: 610

... paying appropriated public funds to vendors, employees or other claimants. N.J.S.A. 40A:5-16 establishes the general requirement that the governing body shall not ...

docket:	a6080-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-10-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28884