Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 40a:9-109")   1 to 3 of 3 results. Run time: 0.817 seconds | Search time: 0.810 seconds    
1 A-2552-11T1 ONYX LEASING SYSTEMS INC v. LAKRISHA STEVENS and SHERIFF OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY M&R AUTO SALES INC v. SHAREFF J. BRAXTON and SHERIFF OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY -- rank: 1000
... motions "for an [o]rder of [a]mercement, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:9-109." Plaintiffs sought "to compel . . . [the Sheriff] to file [MVC] Form ... that th[e] action [was] not properly an amercement under N.J.S.A. 40A:9-109." Second, the Sheriff "contend[ed] that plaintiffs' motion[s] for ... Ct. 1792). Since 1971, the remedy has been codified at N.J.S.A. 40A:9-109 which provides: If a sheriff . . . fails to perform any duty ... statute, which expressly referred to a motion for amercement), with N.J.S.A. 40A:9-109 (referring to "an action or proceeding for amercement" and stating ...
docket: a2550-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-12-28
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 25044
2 A-2552-11T1 ONYX LEASING SYSTEMS INC v. LAKRISHA STEVENS and SHERIFF OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY M&R AUTO SALES INC v. SHAREFF J. BRAXTON and SHERIFF OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY -- rank: 1000
... motions "for an [o]rder of [a]mercement, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:9-109." Plaintiffs sought "to compel . . . [the Sheriff] to file [MVC] Form ... that th[e] action [was] not properly an amercement under N.J.S.A. 40A:9-109." Second, the Sheriff "contend[ed] that plaintiffs' motion[s] for ... Ct. 1792). Since 1971, the remedy has been codified at N.J.S.A. 40A:9-109 which provides: If a sheriff . . . fails to perform any duty ... statute, which expressly referred to a motion for amercement), with N.J.S.A. 40A:9-109 (referring to "an action or proceeding for amercement" and stating ...
docket: a2552-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-12-28
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 25044
3 GARDEN STATE ANESTHESIA – RARITAN BAY v. KETTY SIBILLY -- rank: 691
... amercement action, N.J.S.A. 2A:18-29 and N.J.S.A. 40A:9-109, or an action against an employer that refuses to implement ...
docket: dc-003294-11
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided: 2017-07-27
status:
citation: 456 N.J.Super. 410 195 A.3d 130
Document Size: 10256
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!