Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 JOHN P. CONWAY v. BOROUGH OF FLORHAM PARK -- rank: 1000

... A. 40A:9-138, and additional back pay pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:9-172 until such time as the Borough's governing body adopts ... 1, 2008. Instead, plaintiff is entitled to damages pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:9-172, which states that when a court finds that a municipal ... We find no merit in these contentions. By its terms, N.J.S.A. 40A:9-172 only requires payment of the employee's salary. We are ... additionally argues that any damages awarded to plaintiff pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:9-172 for the period from January 1, 2008, through March 31 ... 561-62 (1978) (holding that the right to salary under N.J.S.A. 40A:9-172 is subject to mitigation). Accordingly, we remand the matter to ...

docket:	a2323-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-03-05
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	46915

2 State of New Jersey, Department of Corrections v. International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, Local 195 -- rank: 674

... J. at 120-24, was enacted in three separate statutes: N.J.S.A. 40A:9-172. The other two statutes provide essentially the same entitlement, but ... eliminate the no work, no pay rule. See, e.g. , N.J.S.A. 40A:9-172 (allowing back pay for municipal officer or employee dismissed or ...

docket:	a-20-00
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2001-07-12
status:
citation:	169 N.J. 505
Document Size:	127150

3 JOHN R. KELTY VS STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 503

... for members of the New Jersey State Police. For example, N.J.S.A. 40A:9-172 allows recovery of salary for any municipal officer or employee ...

docket:	a2011-98
court:	njappellate
decided:	1999-05-06
status:	published
citation:	<a href=
Document Size:	30774