Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1019-18.opn.html -- rank: 1000

... ethics are adjudicated by the LFB under its exclusive jurisdiction. N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.9. A final decision of the LFB as to these complaints ... 40A:9-22.4, which are appealable as of right, N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.9, the LGEL is silent as to whether the LFB's ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	34054

2 JEFF CARTER v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES CUSTODIAL AGENCY -- rank: 908

... August 9, 2011 through August 9, 2016.' The custodian 1 N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.9 permits final agency decisions pertaining to the New Jersey Local ... otices for a five . . . year period alleging a violation of N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.9 is invalid because it required research. The [c]ustodian had ... from the Appellate Division for LFB decisions addressing violations of N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.9 over a five-year period. The custodian explained that the ... the Appellate Division for L[FB] decisions addressing violations of N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.9 for a five[-]year period.' (emphasis added). Carter asserts that ... he actually sought Notices 'resulting from an appeal (pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.9) of any [LFB] final decision.' (emphasis added). It can hardly ...

docket:	a0483-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-12-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	40510

3 IN THE MATTER OF APPEAL OF THE DECISION OF THE FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP ETHICS BOARD (SOMERSET COUNTY IN FTEB COMPLAINT 11-01 -- rank: 846

... the same manner as any other final State agency decision.' N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.9. A-3902-17T3 6 Appellant concedes that the rule is ... are appealable in the same way as other agency decisions. N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.9. An appeal to our court from a final agency decision ...

docket:	a3902-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-02-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18865

4 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3 IN THE MATTER OF APPEAL OF THE DE -- rank: 758

... is ultra vires due to an insufficient quorum pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.9.' In Point III of his brief, Wickman asserts that the ... than two-thirds of all members of the [B]oard.' N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.9 (emphasis added). It is well established that statutes like N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.9 that 'define a quorum as a majority or larger percentage ... act, and not a reduced body, however occurring'). Thus, because N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.9 states that Board decisions on ethics issues must 'be made ...

docket:	a2561-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-11-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	14932

5 RAVINDER S. BHALLA ESQ - v. LOCAL FINANCE BOARD - -- rank: 745

... less than two-thirds of all members of the board. N.J.S.A. 40A:9-22.9. We recently addressed the statutory-interpretation implications of language referencing ...

docket:	a2384-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-06-22
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15812