Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 IN THE MATTER OF JAMES CAMPBELL -- rank: 1000

... Brunson that the Board's determination would be governed by N.J.S.A. 43:15A-57.1 and Estate of B oyle v. B oard Of Tr ... Board notified Brunson that it denied the appeal pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:15A-57.1 because the only beneficiary designation form the Division had on ... Division notified Brunson that the form was unacceptable pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:15A-57.1 because it was not the proper form and it was ... the record, and we discern no reason to disturb it. N.J.S.A. 43:15A-57.1 mandates that: The designation of beneficiary by a member or ... void. [Emphases added.] We have held "that the language of N.J.S.A. 43:15A-57.1 is unambiguous" in requiring that changes of beneficiaries be filed ...

docket:	a4777-06
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-05-15
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	41584

2 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. CONNESTER MAHONE -- rank: 857

... the trial court failed to consider the relevant pension statute, N.J.S.A. 43:15A-57.1 and its implementing regulation, N.J.A.C. 17:2 ... system must comply with the requirements of the applicable statute, N.J.S.A. 43:15A-57.1, which provides that the "designation of beneficiary by a member ... with the [retirement] system on a form satisfactory to it." N.J.S.A. 43:15A-57.1. Jannie does not claim that James's completion of the ... beneficiary, constituted substantial compliance with the statutory requirement imposed by N.J.S.A. 43:15A-57.1. As April correctly argues, the cases that have accepted a ...

docket:	a4472-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-11-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	52437

3 RICHARD RASCZYK v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM - -- rank: 819

... the record, and we discern no reason to disturb it. N.J.S.A. 43:15A-57.1 mandates that: The designation of beneficiary by a member or ... thereupon become void. We have held 'that the language of N.J.S.A. 43:15A-57.1 is unambiguous' in requiring that changes of beneficiaries be filed ... as a substitute to eliminate the express statutory requirements of N.J.S.A. 43:15A-57.1. Karen had the option to change her primary beneficiary designation ...

docket:	a0905-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-04-06
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18842

4 IN THE MATTER OF A LYNNE LINDENTHAL FOR PETER W LINDENTHAL, DECEASED v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM -- rank: 766

... allowance. With respect to the return of the retirement contributions, N.J.S.A. 43:15A-57.1 states in pertinent part: "Any amounts due for which there ...

docket:	a2793-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-05-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20833

5 IN THE MATTER OF KENNETH VAN ORDEN, JR. -- rank: 755

... permitted. N.J.A.C. 17:2-6.1(c); N.J.S.A. 43:15A-57.1. A prior PERS decision provides some authority for the proposition ...

docket:	A0540-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2006-03-02
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	55777