Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1784-18.opn.html -- rank: 1000

... a ten-year extension of her account until 2025 under N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a). The Board denied Triola's request. It determined that ... that would qualify [her] for the [ten] year exception under N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8.' Triola appealed the Board's decision. Though the Board found ... GCC did not qualify as a discontinuance of employment under N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a), Triola contended the statute permits an employee to continue ... qualify for a ten-year extension of her account under N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a). The Board explained that '[t]he Division's long ... of N.J.S.A. 43:15A-7(e) and N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a) was that the ten-year extension under N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a) was only available 'to employees who have been ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	26900

2 CYNTHIA E. COVIE v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM - -- rank: 961

... 2020, petitioner requested continuation of her PERS membership pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:15A- - 8(a). Petitioner argued that the nature of her separation from ... February 10 and March 9, 2020, taking the position that N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a) does not provide for continuation of membership for employees ... years from her separation from service. A-2797-20 3 N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a). The Board found petitioner did not meet the statutory ... her PERS account is contrary to the plain language of N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a) because she was terminated without fault; the Board should ... her PERS account is contrary to the plain language of N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a), because she was terminated without fault. We conduct a ... their] service for more than two consecutive years.' In turn, N.J.S.A. 43:15A- - 8(a) provides: If a member of the retirement system ...

docket:	a2797-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-12-13
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22258

3 LAURA SHAW v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM -- rank: 810

... concluded that she was not entitled to the extension under N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a). It reached that conclusion without a hearing in the ... and she was within a ten-year period referenced in N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a). Shaw urges us to vacate the decision and remand ... that she was separated from employment. Applying the text of N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a), she contends, therefore, the Board's decision was unreasonable ... Cologna,3 and Del Pomo,4 the Board argues the N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a) exception permitting an extension is 'discrete and limited.' It ... workforce reduction, she is not entitled to an extension under N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a). The Board argues Shaw's reference to N.J ... 1991). A-2216-20 3 misplaced. And that here, under N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a), fault is irrelevant. Instead, she must be 'discontinued ...

docket:	a2216-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-12-14
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	12316

4 FABIO COLOGNA v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES POLICE AND FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT SYSTEM -- rank: 701

... c. 217, § 3 (referring, in the 1980 version of N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a), to a member of the Public Employees' Retirement System ... N.J.S.A. 43:16A-11.4. Affirmed. 1 N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8(a) was amended in 1991 and rephrased, in pertinent part ...

docket:	a4222-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-04-08
status:	published
citation:	430 N.J.Super. 362 64 A.3d 995
Document Size:	43465

5 VERONICA -- rank: 666

... member's account remained active due to the provisions of N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8.' N.J.A.C. 17:2-7.1(b)(5 ...

docket:	a1316-21
court:	appellate
decided:	2024-04-16
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	27661

6 IN THE MATTER OF VALERIE JACALONE -- rank: 516

... J. at 321. Accordingly, we reject Jacalone's claim that N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8 does not apply to her because the conduct for which ...

docket:	a1940-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-07-01
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24479

7 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1952-18.opn.html -- rank: 509

... six years earlier because it did not consider a statute, N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8, which Montero asserted authorized her reenrollment in the initial PERS ... Board erred by failing to properly consider the provisions of N.J.S.A. 43:15A-8. In making the argument, however, she fails to recognize that ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	19726