Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 WILLIAM T. BYRNE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 1000

... regardless of the reason for the overpayment,' in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d); 'disqualified for benefits for a period of one year ... five percent of the total benefits received, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a)(1). Byrne appealed the Director's determinations to the ... liability for a refund of the benefits received pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), and an imposition of a fine totaling twenty-five percent of the benefits received in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a)(1). Thereafter, Byrne appealed the Tribunal's decisions to ... also N.J.A.C. 12:17-6.3(a). ' N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) provides that whenever 'any conditions for the receipt of ... to unemployment benefits.' Brady, 152 N.J. at 218. Additionally, ' N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received ...

docket:	a5518-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-12-21
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32160

2 JOHN A. RUSSELL v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 960

... Director sought the return of $6720 in benefits, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1); disqualified him from future benefits for one year ... equal to twenty-five percent of the benefits, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a). Russell now appeals from a Board of Review final ... 299 N.J. Super. 671, 674-76 (App. Div. 1997); N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). However, if the employee obtains benefits fraudulently, the ... Bd. of Review , 76 N.J. 527, 531 (1978) (interpreting N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)); cf. Orzel v. Bd. of Review , 386 N.J ... equal to twenty-five percent of the amount fraudulently obtained. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a)(1). An employee may also be disqualified from receiving ... of whether the employee knew the statements made were false. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1); Bannan , supra , 299 N.J. Super. at ...

docket:	a3595-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-12-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	44282

3 KAREN MCKNIGHT v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 871

... ending June 30, 2018 through May 4, 2019, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). The central issue on appeal is whether a claimant ...

docket:	a3067-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-07-03
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	38983

4 GINA TALIJAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and DE CASPERIS, STEVEN JAMES -- rank: 859

... 1,908.00 in benefits received during her disqualification, see N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). We affirm. I. Claimant was employed as a part ... requested a refund of $1,908.00 in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) for benefits she improperly received from May 30, 2020 ... affirmed the Director's determination that claimant was liable under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) for $1,908.00 she incorrectly received in unemployment ... requiring that she refund the benefits paid during her disqualification. N.J.S.A. 43:21- - 16(d)(1) requires a claimant refund benefits received while she ... faith and without fault. It is well-settled, however, that ' N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received by ...

docket:	a0413-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-12-19
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19799

5 LAURA CASTAGNA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 853

... regardless of the reason for the overpayment in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d).' The Director stated, if petitioner disagreed with the determination ... to those benefits. A-2835-21 13 The version of N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) in effect when the Director issued the refund request ... to disclose a material fact, or 'for any other reason.' N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) (2017) (amended July 2023); see also Orzel v. Bd ... 386 N.J. Super. 338, 342 (App. Div. 2006) (finding N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) 'has been construed . . . to require reimbursement of benefits erroneously ... 299 N.J. Super. 671, 674 (App. Div. 1997) (finding N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) 'require[d] the full repayment of unemployment benefits received ...

docket:	a2835-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-01-18
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28111

6 ASHLEY ELNAGGAR v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and HR SERVICE GROUP LLC -- rank: 807

... regulation, shall be liable to repay those benefits in full.' N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d).5 The statute ''requires the full repayment of unemployment ... obligating a claimant to refund 5 Effective July 31, 2023, N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) will mandate a 'person shall not be liable to ... future unemployment benefits to which the individual is entitled. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). According to the Board, the benefits to which Elnaggar ...

docket:	a0113-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-01-11
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17486

7 RENEE A. JURATA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 786

... The Division sought refunds of the benefits in question under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) totaling $42,533. Jurata appealed to the Appeal Tribunal ... years [had] elapsed from the time the benefits" were paid. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). The Appeals Tribunal again found the four claims ... years had elapsed since she received of those benefits. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). It found her liable for the remaining $2 ...

docket:	a2784-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21674

8 EDWARD T. CASSIDY, JR v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 771

... ending January 11, 2014, through June 28, 2014, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). We affirm. Between January 11, 2014, and June 28 ... to N.J.S.A. 43:21-5(g) and N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). On April 11, 2016, Cassidy appealed the Tribunal's ... Cassidy liable to refund $3971, rather than $4010, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). This appeal followed. On appeal, Cassidy raises the following ... ending January 11, 2014 through June 28, 2014, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Cassidy grossly underreported his income, claiming he earned only ... while actually earning $241.50 per week during that period. ' N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received by ...

docket:	a0053-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-02-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	22176

9 GEORGE M. THORN v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 765

... September 4, 2010 through June 25, 2011, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.2(b). Finally, under the authority provided in N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a), the Board ordered Thorn to pay a fine in ... determined, as a matter of law, that appellant had violated N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) and was therefore "liable to repay those benefits ... 5,995, which represented 25% of the amount fraudulently obtained. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(a). The Board accepted the Tribunal's decision without modification ... the statutory sanctions has been defined by the Legislature in N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). The statute requires an applicant or another's ... 76 N.J. 527 (1978): Thus, we believe that subsection [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-16](d), which is found in a provision entitled "Penalties", ...

docket:	a3452-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-09-06
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25881

10 PATRICIA MAHER v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 749

... other work,' she was not available for work. Relying on N.J.S.A. 43:21- 16(d), the Tribunal found that Maher was responsible for refunding ... 299 N.J. Super. 671, 674-76 (App. Div. 1997); N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1).1 Affirmed. 1 We recognize that the agency ...

docket:	a0167-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-02-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20395

11 GIANA M. WILSON v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE AND DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 740

... of the benefits paid for which she was not entitled. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Our examination of the record, in light of our ... return the benefits she had already received in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Wilson appealed the final decision and denies she voluntarily ... refund the unemployment benefits that were erroneously paid to her. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received ... elapsed from the time the benefits in question were paid." N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1); see also N.J.A.C. 12:17 ...

docket:	a6006-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21527

12 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2123-12xx.opn.html -- rank: 740

... of the benefits paid for which she was not entitled. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Our examination of the record, in light of our ... return the benefits she had already received in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Wilson appealed the final decision and denies she voluntarily ... refund the unemployment benefits that were erroneously paid to her. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1) requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received ... elapsed from the time the benefits in question were paid." N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1); see also N.J.A.C. 12:17 ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	20219

13 E.P v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 737

... related reason; thus, it again concluded reimbursement was required under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). On February 8, 2022, E.P. appealed the Tribunal ... at 464. The Division is constrained to seek refunds under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), which 'requires the full repayment of unemployment benefits received ... CARES act, must refund those benefits). Although refunds required under N.J.S.A. 43:21-16 may impose a hardship on a claimant, they are 'necessary ... administered and to seek refunds of improperly paid unemployment benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d)(1). The Division's actions were not arbitrary, capricious ...

docket:	a3024-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-10-23
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18787

14 JOANNE H. JONES v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 731

... the Director's decision, finding Jones liable, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d) and N.J.A.C. 12:17-14.2 ... is required to repay all unemployment benefits received pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d). Affirmed. This archive is a service of Rutgers School ...

docket:	a5598-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-07-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	15965

15 ELAINE EMERY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR CHERRY HILL TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION -- rank: 731

... N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g). Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-16(d), the Department mailed appellant a request for a refund ...

docket:	a1909-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-03-02
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	11870