Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 43:21-3")   1 to 15 of 21 results. Run time: 0.713 seconds | Search time: 0.706 seconds    
 Page:1 2 Next 6
1 Patricia J. McClain v. Board of Review, Department of Labor -- rank: 1000
... A. 43:21-7 to -9. As amicus NELA indicates, N.J.S.A. 43:21-3(d)(1)(B)(ii) and N.J.S.A. 43 ...
docket: a-52-65-17
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2019-04-29
status:
citation:
Document Size: 54638
2 KAREN MCKNIGHT v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 990
... claimant's eligibility for, and amount of, unemployment benefits. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-3, -4. Under the Act, the Division must first determine whether ... to the claimant's 'weekly benefit rate less any remuneration.' N.J.S.A. 43:21- 3(b). A claimant's 'weekly benefit rate' is sixty percent ... base year, which in turn is comprised of base weeks. N.J.S.A. 43:21-3(c)(1); N.J.A.C. 12:17-2.1 ...
docket: a3067-20
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-07-03
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 38983
3 FARRUGGIO'S BRISTOL v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 911
... s Unemployment Compensation Fund used to pay eligible unemployment benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-3. See State v. Witrak, 194 N.J. Super. 526, 531 ...
docket: a4932-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-11-18
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 41802
4 JOHN A. RUSSELL v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 902
... Russell applied for benefits based on his partial unemployment. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-3(b), -19(m)(1)(a) (providing for benefits notwithstanding receipt ...
docket: a3595-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-12-26
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 44282
5 ASHLEY ELNAGGAR v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and HR SERVICE GROUP LLC -- rank: 853
... as sixty percent of the average weekly wage, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-3(c). Elnaggar's initial average weekly wage was determined by ...
docket: a0113-21
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2023-01-11
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 17486
6 WILLIAM T. BYRNE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 853
... N.J.A.C. 12:17-2.1. See also N.J.S.A. 43:21-3(b). An individual claiming partial unemployment benefits must 'file a ...
docket: a5518-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-12-21
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 32160
7 CATHERINE G. ALEXANDER v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and COUNTY OF UNION -- rank: 779
... with her claim for standard weekly unemployment benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-3, the Board established a maximum benefit amount of $12,584 ...
docket: a1592-07
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2009-02-27
status: published
citation: 405 N.J.Super. 408 965 A.2d 167
Document Size: 67034
8 STEVEN P. EDELSCHEIN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 767
... in [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-27]. [Emphasis added.] N.J.S.A. 43:21-3(d), sets a time limit on the number of weeks ...
docket: a6295-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-05-31
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 16248
9 CALEDA L. WOODS v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 764
... might have been eligible for partial unemployment benefits, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-3(b), had he truthfully and accurately reported his earnings; the ...
docket: a1865-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-06-23
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20101
10 STEVEN D'AGOSTINO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 727
... base year, which in turn is comprised of base weeks. N.J.S.A. 43:21-3(c)(1). In pertinent part, N.J.S.A. 43 ...
docket: a4912-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-12-14
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 18179
11 DIANE P. STINNEY v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 715
... remuneration . . . in excess of 20% of [her] weekly benefit rate . . . ." N.J.S.A. 43:21-3(b). "Remuneration . . . is all compensation for personal services, including commission ...
docket: a2740-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-06-24
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20375
12 MARYBEL PAZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW and CONTROL SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL -- rank: 706
... Bd. of Review , 194 N.J. 534 , 544 (2008) (quoting N.J.S.A. 43:21-3(a)). "The burden of proof is on the claimant to ...
docket: a5358-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-11-24
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 26207
13 STEVEN J. PHILLIPS v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 672
... work were deducted from his benefits, as provided by regulation. N.J.S.A. 43:21-3(b). Claimant continues to look for full-time employment, thus ...
docket: a1344-13
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-04-07
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 20387
14 RAUL ACEVEDO v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 620
... he may collect benefits while employed part-time pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-3(b). In Hay we held that an employee who commits ...
docket: a3355-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2015-04-13
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 14993
15 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/supreme/a2125-14.opn.html -- rank: 617
... 561.18. Utilizing the wage replacement rate of sixty percent, N.J.S.A. 43:21-3(c)(1), the Tribunal calculated a $336 weekly benefit based ... is computed to the next lower multiple of $1.00. N.J.S.A. 43:21-3(c)(1). 3 We note that the Tribunal relied on ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 13674
 Page:1 2 Next 6
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!