Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 43:21-4")   1 to 15 of 113 results. Run time: 1.034 seconds | Search time: 1.023 seconds    
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next 15
1 ANDREA CARTWRIGHT v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and SKC CO. CPAS, LLC -- rank: 1000
... decision finding her ineligible for disability benefits during unemployment under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1) from February 15, 2015 through March 28, 2015 ... 15, 2015, through March 28, 2015. The Appeal Tribunal observed N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1) provides that unemployed individuals shall be eligible to ... for A-0194-18T4 5 disability benefits during unemployment under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1) between February 15, 2015 and March 28, 2015 ... during unemployment, but under defined and limited circumstances. See generally N.J.S.A. 43:21-4. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1) authorizes disability benefits during unemployment to individuals suffering ... The Division qualified claimant for disability benefits during unemployment under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1) from December 28, 2014, when her disability ...
docket: a0194-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-11-21
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 22187
2 PAUL B. DALNOKY v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 973
... disqualified him for benefits from June 21, 2015, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21- 4(g), because he was employed with an educational institution and ... by the work schedule and submitting inaccurate timesheets. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1), the Tribunal also concluded Dalnoky was employed by ... for unemployment benefits as of July 2, 2017. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1), the Division notified Dalnoky he was ineligible for ... the PDL&WD. He also argues the Tribunal examiner misinterpreted N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g) and the statute unfairly burdens substitute teachers. In A-1927-17, Dalnoky argues N.J.S.A. 43:21-4 requires a finding of a reasonable assurance of returning to ... services at an educational institution in the following academic year. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) states: benefits shall not be paid based ...
docket: a5118-15
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-02-21
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 30316
3 FREDM. BURG v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT and BROOKDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE -- rank: 960
... of December 25, 2011 through January 21, 2012, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(3). The Board also found that although appellant was ... could 'only be held not ineligible for benefits pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c), from January 22, 2012 through July 14, 2012, as ... applicable law, the Appeal Tribunal relied on and quoted from N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) to (4), which addresses the ineligibility of instructors ... reasonable assurance' of returning in successive academic years or terms. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1). The statute also addresses an individual's ineligibility ... in the period immediately following such period or holiday recess[.]' N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(3). Based on these provisions, it concluded that even ... through December 17, 2011. The Appeal Tribunal then quoted from N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1), which imposes an obligation on claimants to ...
docket: a4755-14
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-03-01
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 41131
4 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0831-19.opn.html -- rank: 954
... for unemployment benefits because she was unavailable for work. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). We affirm. The following facts are derived from ... because she was not available for work as required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). The Tribunal found that plaintiff's voluntary work ... 287 N.J. Super. 281, 284 (App. Div. 1996) (quoting N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1)). There is a limited exception for individuals who ... time work was unavailable for work within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 43:21- - 4(c)(1)); McCoy v. Bd. of Rev., Dep't of ... an individual must be actively seeking work to receive benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(4)(A) provides that: an individual, who is otherwise ... was not 'otherwise eligible' for benefits within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(4)(A) because she voluntarily restricted her work ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 25964
5 STEVEN P. EDELSCHEIN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 931
... disability during unemployment" benefits on March 28, 2010. 1 See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f). The claim was denied and he administratively appealed the ... on which a claim for benefits can be based. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4. However, all of those thresholds require that the applicant have ... be available to work in order to qualify for benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c). However, the statute makes an exception for persons who ... are receiving unemployment benefits. Ibid. This exception, set forth in N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f), requires that, apart from the disability, the person must ... out of work. . . . Subsections (f) and (g) were added [to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4], the former providing that where an unemployed individual suffered a ... meet the eligibility requirements for receiving unemployment benefits. Ibid. ; see N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f)(1). For non-agricultural workers, an applicant for ...
docket: a6295-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-05-31
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 16248
6 MARY F. TRONGONE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and CARE BY YOUR SIDE LLC -- rank: 899
... claim dated 6/28/2009 is invalid in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e). In October 2010, Trongone appealed the second Appeal Tribunal ... benefits, if otherwise eligible and not otherwise disqualified. See generally N.J.S.A. 43:21-4 (eligibility conditions); N.J.S.A. 43:21-5 (dis ...
docket: a6135-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-06-12
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 46023
7 John M. Utley v. Board of Review, Department of Labor -- rank: 895
... would have been entitled to benefits under the Act. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4 and -5. See generally Sweeney v. Bd. of Review , 43 ...
docket: a-126-06
court:
decided: 2008-05-15
status:
citation: 194 N.J. 534
Document Size: 83792
8 MATTHEW J. BOZEK v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 882
... claim for temporary DDU benefits on September 4, 2011. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f). Bozek received a weekly payment of $598 from September ... be available to work in order to qualify for benefits. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c). However, the statute makes an exception for persons who ... unable to work while they are receiving unemployment benefits. Ibid. ; N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f). This exception requires that, apart from the disability, the ... as defined in [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-27]. [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(f).] The temporary disability benefits law was enacted to fill ... was required to satisfy the relevant eligibility requirements found in N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(6): The individual applying for benefits in any successive ... earned during the second benefit year within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(6). We disagree. Bozek relies on our decision ...
docket: a1050-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-04-04
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 15528
9 WILLIAM T. BYRNE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 856
... note that neither the Tribunal nor the Board relied on N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g), disqualifying employees of educational institutions from payment of unemployment ...
docket: a5518-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-12-21
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 32160
10 TANYA S. VIALET v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 850
... from December 12, 2010 to January 1, 2011, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1), which provides that an unemployed individual may receive ... of the statutorily recognized exceptions to the "availability" requirement under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). The exceptions recognized by the Legislature are: compulsory, unpaid vacation, N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(3); participation in approved, training programs, N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(4); jury duty, N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(5); attending an immediate family member's funeral, N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(6); and participation in an approved, self-employment ...
docket: a1226-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-10-26
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 12929
11 MICHELE M. JELLEY v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 846
... institution in the second of such academic years or terms[.] [ N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) (emphasis added).] The Division's regulations similarly provide ... 12:17-12.4(a)(1). As we have explained, N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1) is tailored to meet the unique ten month ... 337 N.J. Super. 319, 323 (App. Div. 2001).] Under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(g)(1), 'claimants must demonstrate that they did not have ... common-sense understanding of 'reasonable assurance.' Moreover, our Legislature adopted N.J.S.A. 43:21- 4(g)(1) 'to achieve compliance with the Federal Unemployment Tax ...
docket: a0583-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2018-04-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 38638
12 KEONA WRIGHT v. BOARD OF REVIEW NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and CARRIER CLINIC -- rank: 846
... accordance with such regulations as the [D]ivision may prescribe.' N.J.S.A. 43:21-4. Once a claim is approved, it is required that: (a ...
docket: a0036-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2020-02-12
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 27215
13 BELINDA MENDEZ-AZZOLLINI v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 837
... in order to requalify [for unemployment benefits], in accordance with N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(6)' – was erroneous. We agree the Board's ... the Appeal Tribunal concluded appellant was ineligible for benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(6) which sets forth the eligibility requirements for a ... the employer and as such, she did not requalify under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(6). Our review of an administrative agency decision is ... had four weeks of employment' during her period of reinstatement. N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(e)(6). 'Employment' is defined in N.J.S.A ...
docket: a1154-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-03-15
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 21330
14 DOROTHY MOORE v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and BERGEN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, LP -- rank: 830
... benefits from November 1, 2015, through October 29, 2016, under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). We affirm. Moore worked for Bergen Regional Medical ... from November 1, 2015 to October 29, 2016, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1), because she was not available for work and ... day, the Tribunal held Moore ineligible for unemployment benefits under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1) during the relevant time period because she was ... that Moore did not otherwise meet the eligibility requirements under N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). This appeal followed. On appeal, Moore argues it ... benefits was her failure to actively seek work pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1). This statute provides that an individual is not ... seeking work.' Ford, 287 N.J. Super. at 284 (quoting N.J.S.A. 43:21- 4(c)(1)). As for what constitutes actively seeking work, ' ...
docket: a4382-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-10-31
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 15868
15 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5106-18.opn.html -- rank: 830
... he was 3 This presumption arises from the language in N.J.S.A. 43:21-4(c)(1), which provides as a condition to receiving unemployment ...
docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 53880
 Page:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next 15
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!