Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 COMMITTEE ON OPINION JAMES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. Plaintiff v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION et al. -- rank: 1000

... or intent is the failure of the Legislature to amend N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(h) and -14(e) to change "judicial review" to "Tax ... it chose not to amend the "judicial review" wording in N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(h) and -14(e). Also, of significance is the fact ...

docket:	05268-98
court:
decided:	1999-06-22
status:
citation:	18 N.J. Tax 224
Document Size:	111955

2 NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP, INC v. BOARD OF REVIEW and MARCELA ARRUBLA -- rank: 983

... rules and procedures to which trial courts are bound. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(f). The auditor's testimony also appears to have been ...

docket:	a4493-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-07-18
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	27489

3 ERIC E. BELL v. BOARD OF REVIEW and LABOR READY NORTHEAST, INC -- rank: 983

... did not appeal the redetermination within the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1).1 In January 2016, claimant suffered a heart ... Enterprises, LLC/Burger King, and was terminated from that 1 N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) provides in pertinent part: Unless the claimant . . . within ... the appeal tribunal dismissed claimant's appeal as untimely under N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), and for failure to establish good cause for ... behalf of Labor Ready. The appeal tribunal again 2 See N.J.S.A. 43.21-6(c) (requiring an appeal to the Board to be filed ... Despite the rigid language of the deadlines set forth in N.J.S.A. 43:21- - 6(b)(1), our case law provides for exceptions to the ...

docket:	a1127-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2019-03-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18441

4 FANG LIU v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and VINTAGE PHARMACEUTICALS LLC -- rank: 983

... Tribunal that are not appealed become decisions of the Board. . . . N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). Consequently, the appeal tribunals are creatures of the Board ... last employer in order to determine eligibility under the UCL. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). If an employer fails to respond, the Division ...

docket:	a5896-17
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-02-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	23214

5 LAURAJ. FREDA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ATHENIA MASON SUPPLY INC -- rank: 962

... notice that the Board hereby exercises its authority pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e) to take jurisdiction over any and all issues arising ... of the [Board], unless further appeal is initiated pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 43:21- 6(e)].' N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). Freda filed a timely appeal. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e) provides: The [Board] may on its own motion affirm ... 1951), where we said: The Board had the power under [N.J.S.A.] 43:21-6(e), which it exercised in the present case, to assume ...

docket:	a5106-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-02-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	29859

6 WARREN M. JENTIS v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 958

... cannot review an agency decision until it has become final. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(h). Thus, an appellant must exhaust administrative remedies prior to ...

docket:	a0732-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-01-30
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	20317

7 JESSICA WILEMAN v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 950

... Appeal Tribunal dismissed the appeal as untimely filed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), which requires a claimant to file an appeal ... not establish "good cause" for relaxing the statutory restrictions in N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). The Appeal Tribunal also, as authorized by N ... In Rivera , a migrant farm worker challenged the provisions in N.J.S.A. 43-21-6(d) which deemed a notice "received" by the claimant if ... final. [ Id. at 580.] Citing the clear statutory mandate in N.J.S.A. 43-21-6(d) 1 , which requires notices to be sent to the ... cause" to warrant the relaxation of the time restrictions in N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). Affirmed. 1 The provisions in N.J.S.A. 43-21-6(d) mirror in all material respects the provisions in ...

docket:	a0322-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	0000-00-00
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24061

8 ATUL PATEL v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 950

... 26, 2016, because the appeal was not timely filed under N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). Having reviewed the record in light of the ... evidence about the reasons claimant filed his appeal beyond the N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) deadline. In its decision, the Appeal Tribunal found ... days of [his] receipt of the determination,' as required under N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), and claimant failed to demonstrate good cause for ... Board determined the appeal was properly dismissed as untimely under N.J.S.A. 43:21- 6(b)(1) and claimant failed to establish good cause for ... 2017, well beyond the deadlines for filing an appeal. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1); N.J.A.C. 12:20-3.1 ... of appeals to the appeal tribunals, as set forth at N.J.S.A. 43:21-6 . . . .'). The regulations, however, require that appeals filed A-5127- ...

docket:	a5127-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-11-28
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24288

9 NELSON P. BALBOA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR -- rank: 901

... within twenty days after the "date of notification or mailing." N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c); see also N.J.A.C. 12:20-4 ... to the Appeal Tribunal for a fair hearing, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(d), from the demand for refund. We recognize such a ...

docket:	a1500-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-10-20
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33752

10 A-0KEVIN DAVIS v. BOARD OF REVIEW, MOBILE CLEANING SYSTEMS, LLC AND MARINE CONTRACTING LLC,1 May 19 2015 -- rank: 897

... determination, but did not appeal within the time required by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). On April 27, 2013, less than eight weeks ... last-known address" to file an appeal from the determination. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1). If the claimant does not timely appeal the ...

docket:	a3046-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2015-04-27
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	19326

11 MARIA E. PENA v. BOARD OF REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, and VEXWIRE LLC -- rank: 892

... Board was not required to make any additional findings. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e)(stating that the Board may, in part, "affirm, modify ...

docket:	a6378-11
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-07-14
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	19349

12 FRANSCISCA RAMIREZ v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and EXECUTIVE HOME CARE, LLC -- rank: 872

... d). The Board dismissed the appeal for lateness pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21- 6(b)(1). After a review of the contentions advanced on ... ten days from the mailing of the notice to object. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1); N.J.A.C. 12:17-3.3 ... exception to the twenty-day period for filing appeals under N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c), based in part on the claimant's inability to ... unable to determine the timeliness of the employer's objection. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) provides, in pertinent part: Unless the claimant or ...

docket:	a3755-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-06-29
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	31235

13 JIMMY LIN v. BOARD OF REVIEW -- rank: 872

... Appeal Tribunal's decision mentions the fact that, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e), the Board has the right to "take jurisdiction over ... days after the mailing of the Appeal Tribunal's decision. N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). As we held in Von Ouhl v. Board of ... 52 (App. Div.), certif. denied , 130 N.J. 10 (1992), N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c) provides that a decision of an Appeal Tribunal "shall ... appeal is initiated pursuant to subsection (e) of this section." N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e) authorizes appeals to the Board of Review by interested ... it must act within the ten day period provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(c). Kaske v. State of N.J., Bd. of Review ...

docket:	a2169-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-04-25
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24487

14 DOREEN L. SIMON v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT -- rank: 868

... East Windsor synagogue, and any corporate entity or entities. See N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(e) (stating the Board may 'direct the taking of additional ...

docket:	a1972-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-12-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41194

15 JOSEPH A. KNOEBL v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC -- rank: 864

... denial of benefits was filed beyond the time provided by N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) without a showing of good cause for the ... and without good cause attributable to the work. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), Knoebl had ten days from the date of ... appeal was properly dismissed in accordance with the provisions of N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1), the Deputy's deter­mination having become final ... 29 (1981). In this case there is no dispute that N.J.S.A. 43:21-6(b)(1) requires that an appeal be filed within ten ...

docket:	a3560-09
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2011-02-16
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	32076