13 Results for [("N.J.S.A. 43:3c-9.5")]

Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

Results for ("N.J.S.A. 43:3c-9.5") 1 to 13 of 13 results.

Run time: 0.854 seconds | Search time: 0.847 seconds

1 THOMAS CANNAVO v. HON CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE -- rank: 1000

... 3B-1 to -10; and 3) non-forfeitable rights statute, N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5. We will discuss that framework here. A. The State-Administered ... s or fund's actuary, and an accrued liability contribution. N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(c)(1). "The amount of the State's annually required ... in all annual appropriations acts as a dedicated line item," N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(c)(1), and the Legislature "shall make an appropriation sufficient ... years of service credit in the retirement system or fund . . . ." N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(b). "[A] 'non-forfeitable right to receive benefits' means that ... post-retirement medical benefits which are provided pursuant to law." N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(a). Nonetheless, N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(e) provided: Except as expressly provided herein and only ...

docket:	a6002-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-26
status:	published
citation:
Document Size:	137144

2 THOMAS CANNAVO v. HON CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE -- rank: 1000

docket:	a5973-11
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-06-26
status:	published
citation:	436 N.J.Super. 220 93 A.3d 387
Document Size:	137311

3 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a0632-12xx.opn.html -- rank: 1000

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	136163

4 Richard W. Berg v. Hon. Christopher J. Christie -- rank: 934

... forfeitable right” statute, L. 1997, c. 113 (presently codified as N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5). The Pension Adjustment Act (PAA) started the modern legislative provision ... right” statute. See L. 1997, c. 113 (presently codified as N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5). Qualifying members of the State’s public pension systems or ... under the laws governing the retirement system or fund.” N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(b). By codifying that “non-forfeitable right to receive ... for whom the right has attached, cannot be reduced.” N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(a). That legislative enactment underscored the view that a public ... COLAs are part of the “benefits program” protected by N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5 depends on whether the Legislature, in enacting N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(a) and (b), intended to create a contractual right ...

docket:	A-71-72
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2016-06-09
status:
citation:
Document Size:	174735

5 Burgosv. State of New Jersey -- rank: 848

... be reduced once the right to them had attached. See N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(a)-(b). The individual members of the public pension systems ... of Chapter 78, L. 2011, c. 78, the Legislature amended N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(c). Chapter 78’s amendment to subsection (c) introduced contractual ... Jersey Legislature enacted Chapter 78, section 26 of which amended N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(c), addressing the responsibility of State employers to contribute to ... 1997, c. 113, § 5.] 3 Chapter 78 substantially changed N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(c). The State remains required to make ANC and UAAL ... added important language that is the subject of this matter. N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(c) now reads, in relevant part: (1) The State and ... each employee. . . . [ L. 2011, c. 78, § 26 (codified at N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(c)) (emphasis added).] N.J.S.A. 43:3C- ...

docket:	A-55-04
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2015-06-09
status:
citation:
Document Size:	384416

6 Burgos v. State of New Jersey -- rank: 835

... be reduced once the right to them had attached. See N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(a)-(b). The individual members of the public pension systems ... of Chapter 78, L. 2011, c. 78, the Legislature amended N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(c). Chapter 78’s amendment to subsection (c) introduced contractual ... Jersey Legislature enacted Chapter 78, section 26 of which amended N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(c), addressing the responsibility of State employers to contribute to ... L. 1997, c. 113, § 5.] Chapter 78 substantially changed N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(c). The State remains required to make ANC and UAAL ... added important language that is the subject of this matter. N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(c) now reads, in relevant part: (1) The State and ... employee. . . . 12 [L. 2011, c. 78, § 26 (codified at N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(c)) (emphasis added).] N.J.S.A. 43:3C- ...

docket:	A-55-14
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2015-06-09
status:
citation:	222 N.J. 175 118 A.3d 270
Document Size:	209909

7 State v. Bennie Anderson -- rank: 625

... 4 3:1-3, and individual pensions remain forfeitable, see N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(d). N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5 was amended by chapter 78, Laws of 2011, in connection ...

docket:	a-15-16-20
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2021-08-11
status:
citation:
Document Size:	80979

8 NEW JERSEY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 574

... reserved to itself the right to "alter [or] modify" TPAF, N.J.S.A. 43:3C:9-5(e), just as Spina described for the pension scheme before ... right to receive accrued pension benefits. The legislative history of N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5 is highly instructive. Senate Bill 1119, which later became Chapter 113 of the laws of 1997, and codified in N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5, was the subject of a legislative hearing before a State ...

docket:	a4460-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-03-04
status:	published
citation:	412 N.J. Super. 192 989 A.2d 282
Document Size:	82907

9 ALFRED J. PETIT-CLAIR, JR v. CITY OF PERTH AMBOY -- rank: 493

... made at least base pension benefits a contractual right. See N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5. However, the statute expressly excluded medical benefits: 'For purposes of ... post-retirement medical benefits which are provided pursuant to law.' N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(a). As medical benefits are not a non- forfeitable right ...

docket:	a2049-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-09-07
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	54419

10 PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 463

... retained the right to "alter, modify or amend" the PFRS. N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(e). This provision indicates that the Legislature did not intent ... PFRS "have a non-forfeitable right to receive [retirement] benefits," N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(b), we find that the statute grants the Legislature discretion ...

docket:	a3681-09
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-08-23
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	28379

11 GAIL M. COOKSON - v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES\' RETIREMENT SYSTEM -- rank: 427

... 252 N.J. Super. 430 , 433 (App. Div. 1991) (recognizing N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5, a statutory provision recognizing that individuals vested in PERS obtain ... 1937)). We find no "clear indication" in the language of N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5 evincing a legislative intent to confer a contractual right to ...

docket:	a5341-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-03-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45744

12 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEW JERSEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 369

... not, create "an enforceable long-term financial contract." Ibid. ; see N.J.S.A. 43:3C-9.5(c). We . . . hold that the Legislature and Governor were without ...

docket:	a1115-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2016-12-12
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	16422

13 ROBERT J. NISH v. THE TOWNSHIP OF MORRIS -- rank: 301

... apart from the Legislature's clear and unequivocal intention in N.J.S.A. 43:3C- 9.5(a), (b) (1997) to vest 'a non-forfeitable right to ...

docket:	a1821-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2022-05-03
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	18999