Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 45:22a-37")   1 to 13 of 13 results. Run time: 0.659 seconds | Search time: 0.652 seconds    
1 CLAIR W. FLINN v. AMBOY NATIONAL BANK -- rank: 1000
... Monmouth POS contained material misrepresentations and omissions, in violation of N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37, a provision within the New Jersey Planned Real Estate Development ... were barred by PREDFDA's six-year statute of limitations, N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(d). The court further concluded that plaintiffs' claims of misrepresentation ... liable for the developer's violations of the statute. See N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(c). A. We begin with a few general observations concerning ... seek double damages, attorneys' fees, and costs, in accordance with N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(a). The trial court dismissed this count with prejudice, on ... them outside of the applicable six-year statute of limitations. N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(d) provides that a unit owner can only sue for ... of the twenty-eight named plaintiffs are time-barred by N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(d) in suing for fraud under PREDFDA. Defendants contend ...
docket: a4216-12
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-07-02
status: unpublished
citation: 436 N.J.Super. 274 93 A.3d 422
Document Size: 87699
2 PASSAIC ARMS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC v. FELBEE REALTY, LP -- rank: 903
... J. Super. at 52. The relevant section of the PREDFDA, N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37, pertains to untruths, omissions or misleading statements by a developer ... a statute of repose. We do not rule on whether N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(d) is a statute of repose or a statute of ... provision. See id. A-1377-18 25 Returning to PREDFDA, N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(d), in pertinent part, provides: 'A person may not recover ... of the statute. 4 PREDFDA contains a 'safe harbor' provision, N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(a), which prevents liability if a principal did not know ...
docket: a1377-18
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-12-29
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 64230
3 TODD A. ETELSON v. SHORE CLUB SOUTH URBAN RENEWAL, L.L.C. TODD A. ETELSON v. SHORE CLUB SOUTH URBAN RENEWAL, L.L.C. -- rank: 751
... not have known of the untruth, omission, or misleading statement. [ N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(a).] The purpose of PREDFDA is to "[e]nsure honesty ... PREDFDA omission claim must be based on a knowing omission. N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(a). Defendants argue, as they did below, that plaintiffs' claim ...
docket: a0570-11 a0570-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-03-10 2014-03-10
status: unpublished unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 110278
4 JOEL H. MOSKOW v. K. HOVNANIAN AT JACKSON, LLC -- rank: 748
... Similarly, under the Planned Real Estate Development Full Disclosure Act, N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37, a developer who makes untrue statements of material fact or ...
docket: a6114-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2012-08-03
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 53483
5 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a4216-12redactedxx.opn.html -- rank: 685
... Monmouth POS contained material misrepresentations and omissions, in violation of N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37, a provision within the New Jersey Planned Real Estate Development ... were barred by PREDFDA's six-year statute of limitations, N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(d). The court further concluded that plaintiffs' claims of misrepresentation ... liable for the developer's violations of the statute. See N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(c). A. We begin with a few general observations concerning ...
docket:
court: NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size: 65386
6 DAWN RICCUITTI and MINDY RUBINSTEIN v. ROBERT MCEWAN -- rank: 662
... of limitations, N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 and N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(d). I. We derive the facts from plaintiffs' complaint and ... forth in N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1 and N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(d). The court further concluded that plaintiffs had not properly ... material fact" relating to the purchase of certain real estate. N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(a), (d). Here, plaintiffs purchased their unit in 2006. The ...
docket: a2303-14
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2016-10-10
status: Published
citation:
Document Size: 24512
7 DA-LU TUNG VS BRIANT PARK HOMES, ET AL -- rank: 655
... phrases "damages suffered" and "court costs expended", as used in N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37, mean damages and costs to the purchaser resulting from a ...
docket: a3149-93
court: njappellate
decided: 1996-02-06
status: published
citation: <a href=
Document Size: 17320
8 SARATOGA AT TOMS RIVER CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC v. MENK CORPORATION, INC -- rank: 651
... payment of money to the developer in the contested transaction." N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(d). However, the applicable regulations state that the warranties under ... the PREDFDA six-year statute of limitations set forth in N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(d), and were not time-barred. Here, plaintiff's warranty ...
docket: a5421-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-07-17
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 71838
9 DIXONMILLS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC v. RGD HOLDING COMPANY, LLC ROBERT MARTIN COMPANY, LLC RMC MEZZANINE COMPANY, LLC PROSPECT CAPITAL GROUP, LLC GREG BERGER, BRUCE PETERSON TIMOTHY M. JONES, NICHOLAS P. VEGLIANTE, MARK DURNO, ROBIN STEINER, DAVID -- rank: 618
... in the tenth count, do require a showing of reliance. N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(a).4 As one treatise has observed, it is not ... can sue under PREDFDA, which only permits suit by 'purchasers.' N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(a). PREDFDA defines a 'purchaser' 4 In an action brought ...
docket: a3383-16
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2017-10-17
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 57620
10 MARK LEVINE et al. v. THE KRAMER GROUP, et al. -- rank: 548
... A. 56:8-1 to 56:8-106, and PREDFDA, N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37, not to make any material misrepresentations and to disclose to ... not have known of the untruth, omission, or misleading statement. [ N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(a)]     The Kramer defendants did not engage in any fraudulent ...
docket: a6271-00
court: njappellate
decided: 2002-10-15
status: published
citation: 354 N.J. Super. 397
Document Size: 16087
11 AMBOY BANK v. OAKSHIRE GROUP, LLC -- rank: 544
... is provided. [ N.J.A.C. 5:26-6.4.] N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37(e) renders void any agreement inconsistent with the PREDFDA. The ...
docket: a0491-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-05-13
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 49632
12 Ellen Nobrega et als. v. Edison Glen Associates, et als. -- rank: 525
... to the defendant, and does not include a tolling provision. N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37, and that is an adequate remedy for purposes of our ...
docket: a-130-99
court: njsupreme
decided: 2001-05-22
status:
citation: 167 N.J. 520
Document Size: 77430
13 FIREMEN'S INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEWARK et al. v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. -- rank: 492
... of budgets, misrepresentation of budget regulation statement in violation of N.J.S.A. 45:22A-37, violations of the Consumer Fraud Act, and negligence of Mark ...
docket: A1687-02
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2006-08-16
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 43480
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!