Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Carol Bedford v. Anthony L. Riello, D.C. -- rank: 1000

... practice of chiropractic shall remain as defined in existing statutes,” N.J.S.A. 45:9-41.27, and that the “[l]aws of this state relating to ... a subluxation may be the only basis for chiropractic care. [ N.J.S.A. 45:9-41.27.] The Act did not alter or otherwise affect the “related ... context, plaintiff’s interpretation pales. Another provision of the statute, N.J.S.A. 45:9-41.27, specifically addresses what the Legislature denominated the “scope of chiropractic ... those amendments specifically rejected other Board regulations. See, e.g , N.J.S.A. 45:9-41.27 (eliminating patient discomfort requirement). Yet the Legislature never signaled any ... practice of chiropractic shall remain as defined in existing statutes.” N.J.S.A. 45:9-41.27. Thus, the definition contained in the pre-existing statute -- N ...

docket:	a-48-06_1
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2008-06-18
status:
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	69397

2 CAROL BEDFORD AND H. PAUL BEDFORD, HER HUSBAND v. ANTHONY L. RIELLO, D.C., PETER E. LOWENSTEIN, D.C. -- rank: 736

... 603 (Sup. Ct. 1936))). Finally, we address defendants' argument that N.J.S.A. 45:9-41.27, a provision of the Chiropractic Board Act, N.J.S ... a subluxation may be the only basis for chiropractic care. [ N.J.S.A. 45:9-41.27 (emphasis added).] Defendants' reliance on this statute is misplaced. The ...

docket:	a5125-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2007-04-18
status:	published
citation:	392 N.J. Super. 270
Document Size:	56485