Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 45:9-41.27")   1 to 2 of 2 results. Run time: 0.657 seconds | Search time: 0.650 seconds    
1 Carol Bedford v. Anthony L. Riello, D.C. -- rank: 1000
... practice of chiropractic shall remain as defined in existing statutes,” N.J.S.A. 45:9-41.27, and that the “[l]aws of this state relating to ... a subluxation may be the only basis for chiropractic care. [ N.J.S.A. 45:9-41.27.] The Act did not alter or otherwise affect the “related ... context, plaintiff’s interpretation pales. Another provision of the statute, N.J.S.A. 45:9-41.27, specifically addresses what the Legislature denominated the “scope of chiropractic ... those amendments specifically rejected other Board regulations. See, e.g , N.J.S.A. 45:9-41.27 (eliminating patient discomfort requirement). Yet the Legislature never signaled any ... practice of chiropractic shall remain as defined in existing statutes.” N.J.S.A. 45:9-41.27. Thus, the definition contained in the pre-existing statute -- N ...
docket: a-48-06_1
court: njsupreme
decided: 2008-06-18
status:
citation: *CITE_PENDING*
Document Size: 69397
2 CAROL BEDFORD AND H. PAUL BEDFORD, HER HUSBAND v. ANTHONY L. RIELLO, D.C., PETER E. LOWENSTEIN, D.C. -- rank: 736
... 603 (Sup. Ct. 1936))). Finally, we address defendants' argument that N.J.S.A. 45:9-41.27, a provision of the Chiropractic Board Act, N.J.S ... a subluxation may be the only basis for chiropractic care. [ N.J.S.A. 45:9-41.27 (emphasis added).] Defendants' reliance on this statute is misplaced. The ...
docket: a5125-04
court: njappellate
decided: 2007-04-18
status: published
citation: 392 N.J. Super. 270
Document Size: 56485

Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!