Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 CHARLES KRAVITZ v. PHILIP D. MURPHY -- rank: 1000

... such deposit remain the property of the tenant . . . .' Ibid. (citing N.J.S.A. 46:8-19). The Governor concluded that 'enabling individuals to pay portions of ... to use 'a security deposit governed by the provisions of N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 et seq., as well as the tenant's portion of ... landlord],' and shall be deposited in an interest bearing account. N.J.S.A. 46:8-19. The SDA also provides instruction as to: what happens to ... and security deposits are the property of tenants, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 46:8-19. Moreover, respondents point out that EO 128 does not relieve ... to how a security deposit is paid, maintained, and returned, N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 and -21.1; how much of a security deposit a ...

docket:	a1584-20
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-07-20
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	89004

2 KELLY REILLY v. MARC WEISS -- rank: 795

... contend that the judge 1) "misapplied" the Security Deposit Act, N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26 (the SDA); and 2) erred in concluding their ... of some of its statutory obligations. For example, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 46:8-19, a landlord must place a tenant's security deposit in ... tenant's security in an interest-bearing account, thus violating N.J.S.A. 46:8-19, and that he had failed to comply with N.J ... 60. However, in reversing, we noted that any violation of N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 "d[id] not mandate forfeiture of [the] security deposit[.]" Id ... 46:8-21.2, and the more technical violations of N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 and N.J.S.A. 46:8-21.1 discussed ... excess deposit similar to that required for a violation of N.J.S.A. 46:8-19. To the extent a contrary result occurred in Alston ...

docket:	a5065-07
court:	njappellate
decided:	2009-03-24
status:	published
citation:	406 N.J.Super. 71
Document Size:	58603

3 BRIAN HEYERT v. MENASSIE TADDESE -- rank: 743

... the CFA, and violating the Rent Security Deposit Act (RSDA), N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26, and against the Board for erroneously granting the ...

docket:	a4801-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2013-06-25
status:	published
citation:	431 N.J.Super. 388 70 A.3d 680
Document Size:	128038

4 DIRA MANAGEMENT et al. v. DAWN BANKS -- rank: 737

... plaintiff landlord's failure to provide timely notice required by N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to inform her, in writing by January 31, 2004, of ... only that Dira's conduct was in "substantial compliance" with N.J.S.A. 46:8-19, but also that its August 9, 2004 correspondence to defendant ... Act) became effective in New Jersey on January 1, 1968. N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26. It has been amended several times since. L ... 100; L. 1997, c. 310. The most recent amendment to N.J.S.A. 46:8-19, L. 2003, c. 188, § 1, effective January 1, 2004 ... of P.L. 1967, c. 265 (C. 46:8-20). [ N.J.S.A. 46:8-19(c).] If the landlord, after receiving a security deposit, fails ... be entitled to make further demand for a security deposit. [ N.J.S.A. 46:8-19(c).] However, where the annual notice has not been ...

docket:	A2560-04
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-11-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	41650

5 ADRIEN SPEED and DANIELLE SHINE v. MACAULAY WILLIAMS -- rank: 694

... alleged defendant failed to comply with the Security Deposit Act, N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26, and pursuant to the Act, sought a judgment ...

docket:	a3152-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-02-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17955

6 JASSMEN ELBEGDAD v. EHSAN MALIK -- rank: 662

... and related relief pursuant to the Security Deposit Act ('SDA'), N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26. The trial court dismissed her Special Civil Part ... days after the tenant ultimately vacated the premises in September. N.J.S.A. 46:8-19(c). In addition, under these circumstances in which the tenant ...

docket:	a1480-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-11-08
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	10344

7 LIZA ANNE HEIDT v. NANCY CASTELINO -- rank: 645

... plus interest, towards her rent payments. Plaintiff claimed defendant violated N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 by failing to provide her with the security deposit's ... it determined defendant did not provide adequate notice pursuant to N.J.S.A. 46:8-19. The statute provides: The person investing the security deposit . . . shall ... of the receipt of the security deposit from the tenant; . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 46:8-19(c).] Here, the lease only stated the deposit was held ... credible. Therefore, the trial court ordered the appropriate remedy under N.J.S.A. 46:8-19(c). Defendant also argues plaintiff did not establish the exact ... to comply with the statute's thirty-day requirement. See N.J.S.A. 46:8-19(c)(1). However, defendant claimed she sent plaintiff the notice ...

docket:	a1049-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-03-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	35152

8 Franklin Tower One v. N.M. -- rank: 633

... cause” for eviction of residential tenant); Rent Security Deposit Act, N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26 (imposing limitations and requirements on security deposit collected ...

docket:	a-159-97
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1999-03-23
status:
citation:	157 N.J. 602
Document Size:	66807

9 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1409-17.opn.html -- rank: 628

... and attorney's fees under the Security Deposit Act (SDA), N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26, for plaintiff's alleged failure to return defendant ... or become an asset of the person receiving the same. [N.J.S.A. 46:8-19(a).] The SDA also provides that '[w]ithin [thirty] days ... maintain the security deposit in an interest bearing account, see N.J.S.A. 46:8-19(a)(2) (requiring security deposits to be placed in interest ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	33536

10 MARVIN WARE et al. v. CAROL SWEENEY et al. -- rank: 605

... claims arising from alleged violations of the Security Deposit Act, N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -28, and of N.J.S.A. 2A:42 ... rental payment constituted a security deposit within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 46:8-19, we of course are not bound by that conclusion. Manalapan ... Comm. , 140 N.J. 366 , 378 (1995). To be sure, N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 includes "money . . . deposited or advanced on a . . . lease . . . for the ... trust for the person who made the deposit or advance. N.J.S.A. 46:8-19. Here, the $925 was applied to the first month rent ...

docket:	a7045-03
court:	njappellate
decided:	2005-12-02
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	46344

11 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a5487-14.opn.html -- rank: 599

... IN ITS APPLICATION OF NEW JERSEY'S SECURITY DEPOSIT LAW, [ N.J.S.A. 46:8-19], TO A NON-RESIDENTIAL TENANT. POINT II THE TRIAL COURT ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	20277

12 CHARLES W. C. JOHNSTON v. MARK CAMIOLO -- rank: 582

... with provisions of the security deposit statute, set forth in N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 and N.J.S.A. 46:8-21.1. On ... He also claimed entitlement to interest on the deposit. See N.J.S.A. 46:8-19. Further, Camiolo asserted that Johnston had violated N.J.S ... bank surcharge. However, the judge found that Johnston had violated N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 by failing to provide proper notice of the location of ... Penbara we held that noncompliance with the notice provisions of N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 does not mandate forfeiture of a security deposit, 347 N ...

docket:	a6165-04
court:	njappellate
decided:	2006-03-21
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	25000

13 KAREN HOOPER v. PARKWOOD PLACE APARTMENTS -- rank: 570

... involves a claim under the Security Deposit Act (the SDA), N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26. Plaintiff Karen Hooper claimed that defendant Parkwood Place ... A. 46:8-21.1, added prejudgment interest pursuant to N.J.S.A. 46:8-19(c), and awarded plaintiff a judgment of $2827.48. Defendant ...

docket:	a1362-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-01-24
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	55548

14 DORIS CANALES v. YUE YU v. CHARLES HAYWOOD and YVONETTE SWINGER -- rank: 564

... 1345-16T1 deposit under New Jersey's Security Deposit Act, N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26. The court scheduled a trial date and notified ...

docket:	a1345-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-01-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	45443

15 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a3251-19.opn.html -- rank: 559

... costs. The judge ruled that the Security Deposit Act (Act), N.J.S.A. 46:8-19 to -26, which would have doubled plaintiff's damages and ...

docket:
court:
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	6162