Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 John Seals and Julia Seals v. County of Morris -- rank: 1000

... remand. First, the statutes governing the placement of telephone poles, N.J.S.A. 48:17-8 and 17-11, are different from the one governing electric ...

docket:	a-84-10
court:	New Jersey Supreme Court
decided:	2012-05-14
status:
citation:
Document Size:	675075

2 JOHN SEALS v. COUNTY OF MORRIS -- rank: 736

... in the solution is very great." Ibid. Further, referring to N.J.S.A. 48:17-8, the Court noted that a utility company has no right ...

docket:	a5433-08
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2010-11-24
status:	published
citation:	417 N.J.Super. 74 8 A.3d 796
Document Size:	84750

3 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. KEITH R. BUCKLEY -- rank: 696

... that a utility company must meet when erecting utility poles. N.J.S.A. 48:17-8 grants permission to any utility company to "erect, construct and ...

docket:	a2973-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-09-19
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	36163

4 CONTEY V. NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY -- rank: 465

... determine the location of poles or facilities along the roadway. N.J.S.A. 48:17-8 grants permission to any utility company "organized under the laws ...

docket:	a-132-93
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1994-07-20
status:
citation:	136 N.J. 582
Document Size:	37738