Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Melcar Utility Co. -- rank: 1000

... PER CURIAM The essential issue in this appeal is whether N.J.S.A. 48:2-80(d), as written, impinges on the constitutional right to a jury trial for property damages. N.J.S.A. 48:2-80(d), a provision appearing in the Underground Facility Protection Act ... may be affected by a planned excavation or demolition.” N.J.S.A. 48:2-80(a)(2). The UFPA carries significant penalties for those who ... disregard its mandates. Of particular significance to the underlying dispute, N.J.S.A. 48:2-80(d) imposes liability on the excavator for any negligent damage ... motion to dismiss the matter for lack of jurisdiction, citing N.J.S.A. 48:2-80(d). Melcar argued that subsection (d) compels parties seeking monetary ... L’s complaint without prejudice. JCP&L appealed, arguing that N.J.S.A. 48:2-80(d) does not require that claims valued at less ...

docket:	a-96-10
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2013-01-24
status:
citation:
Document Size:	121439

2 FUNTOWN PIER AMUSEMENTS INC v. BISCAYNE ICE CREAM AND ASUNDRIES, INC. -- rank: 633

... is an underground facility per the UFPA. Plaintiffs next cite N.J.S.A. 48:2-80(b) of the UFPA for the proposition that it 'imposes ... meter attached to the Biscayne building. We are not persuaded. N.J.S.A. 48:2-80(b) has a narrow focus and application. It imposes a ... as it held that the UFPA's mandatory arbitration clause, N.J.S.A. 48:2-80(d), was unconstitutional, and did not vitiate a utility company ...

docket:	a1797-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2024-01-09
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	49633

3 IN RE READOPTION OF N.J.A.C. 14:2 -- rank: 582

... required to mark out the facility within three business days. N.J.S.A. 48:2-80(a)(2). The Act defines an operator as a person ...

docket:	a3913-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-08-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34801

4 INTHE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR THE EXPUNGEMENT OF THE CRIMINAL RECORD BELONGING TO J.W -- rank: 506

... reference to the right to pursue civil remedies elsewhere in . . . [N.J.S.A. 48:2-80], we cannot insert language that the Legislature could have included ...

docket:	a1730-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-02-26
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	72419

5 VERIZON NEW JERSEY INC v. J.F. KIELY CONSTRUCTION CO -- rank: 488

... eighteen] inches horizontally from the outside wall of the facility . . . .' N.J.S.A. 48:2-80. Generally, these mark outs are symbols spray-painted on the ...

docket:	a1078-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-12-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26732

6 JAMES CONSTRUCTION COMPANY VS BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY & JOSEPH L. MUSCARELLE -- rank: 465

... Call System of a planned excavation nearby to a facility. N.J.S.A. 48:2-80 to -82. ����The BPU thus commenced an investigation of whether ...

docket:	a3623-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1997-03-06
status:	published
citation:	298 N.J.Super. 355
Document Size:	24060

7 COUNTY OF MONMOUTH v. JERSEY CENTRAL POWER LIGHT -- rank: 427

... their] underground facilities which may be affected' by an excavation. N.J.S.A. 48:2-80(a)(2). The One-Call System provided six utility operators ...

docket:	a2571-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-02-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17807