Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Melcar Utility Co. -- rank: 1000

... jury for a common-law cause of action in negligence. N.J.S.A. 48:2-82(d)(3) expressly imposes on excavators the common-law responsibility ... days prior to the commencement of any excavation or demolition. N.J.S.A. 48:2-82. The UFPA also requires that, within three days of receipt ... to avoid damaging the property of operators of underground facilities. N.J.S.A. 48:2-82(d)(3) expressly imposes on excavators the common-law responsibility ...

docket:	a-96-10
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2013-01-24
status:
citation:
Document Size:	121439

2 VERIZON NEW JERSEY INC v. J.F. KIELY CONSTRUCTION CO -- rank: 893

... nunc pro tunc the issue of defendant's liability under N.J.S.A. 48:2-82 only. R. 2:4-4(b)(2); see also Medcor ... days prior to the beginning of the excavation or demolition.' N.J.S.A. 48:2-82(a). When an excavator notifies the One-Call system, the ... the excavator in the course of an excavation or demolition.' N.J.S.A. 48:2-82(e). The existence of '[e]vidence that an excavation . . . that ... facility was performed without providing the notice required pursuant to [N.J.S.A. 48:2-82] . . . shall be prima facie evidence . . . that the damage was caused ... One- Call system of its intent to excavate, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 48:2- 82. As provided in its One-Call ticket, defendant's start ... evidence 5 A-1078-16T3 of defendant's negligence. See N.J.S.A. 48:2-82(a) and 48:2-89. Defendant presents no evidence ...

docket:	a1078-16
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-12-28
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	26732

3 IN RE READOPTION OF N.J.A.C. 14:2 -- rank: 715

... days prior to the beginning of the excavation or demolition." N.J.S.A . 48:2-82(a). Once an excavator notifies the System, the One-Call ...

docket:	a3913-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-08-18
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	34801

4 HARBOR PINES LAND, LLC v. SOUTH JERSEY GAS COMPANY -- rank: 698

... facility was performed without providing the notice required pursuant to [ N.J.S.A. 48:2-82] shall be prima facie evidence . . . that the damage was caused ...

docket:	a6091-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2012-03-14
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	25484

5 COUNTY OF MONMOUTH v. JERSEY CENTRAL POWER LIGHT -- rank: 695

... to excavate at least three business days before any excavation. N.J.S.A. 48:2-82. The One-Call System then forwards the notice to the ... demolition to avoid damage to or interference with underground facilities.' N.J.S.A. 48:2- 82(d)(3). Moreover, statutory compliance 'does not prevent a finding ... statutory duty to provide notification to the One -Call System. N.J.S.A. 48:2-82(d)(3). While defendant provided the required notification to the ...

docket:	a2571-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-02-22
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17807

6 INTHE MATTER OF ALLEGED VIOLATION OF THE UNDERGROUND FACILITY PROTECTION ACT, N.J.S.A 48:2-73 ET SEQ. BY DAVID HERZOG STAR DEVELOPERS, LLC -- rank: 541

... that Star1 engaged in excavation before it was authorized. See N.J.S.A. 48:2-82(a) (stating that an excavator must notify One-Call Damage ...

docket:	a5449-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-02-21
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	17711