Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 IN THE MATTER OF ERIC J BRUNO and MIRAKILL BRANDS, LLC -- rank: 1000

... 49(m) of the Securities Law and were required by N.J.S.A. 49:3-60 to be registered with the Bureau, federally covered, or exempt ... registered with the Bureau, federally covered, or exempt pursuant to N.J.S.A. 49:3-60. 24. Each offer or sale of unregistered securities constitutes a violation of N.J.S.A. 49:3-60 and is cause for the imposition of civil monetary penalties pursuant to N.J.S.A. 49:3-60. .... 26. Bruno acted as an agent, as defined under N ... 49:3-49(m) and unregistered securities in violation of N.J.S.A. 49:3-60 and that 'Mirakill refer[red] to the Units as securities ... or (3) the security is exempt under the Securities Law. N.J.S.A. 49:3-60. The Securities Law defines the term 'security' broadly; it ...

docket:	a0967-19
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-03-25
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	38150

2 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a1030-19.opn.html -- rank: 742

... J.S.A. 49:3-56(a); selling unregistered securities, N.J.S.A. 49:3-60; and unjust enrichment. The A-1030-19 4 civil complaint ... 3-56(a) (count four); and (4) selling unregistered securities, N.J.S.A. 49:3-60 (count six). The Bureau also made a claim for unjust ...

docket:
court:	New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	47632

3 Oleg v. Brian -- rank: 570

... claims could not be sold under New Jersey law. See N.J.S.A. 49:3-60. This claim requires different treatment. In his complaint, plaintiff's ...

docket:	a1064-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-10-04
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	90386