Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 /usr/local/share/www/libweb/collections/courts/appellate/a2602-15a2815-15.opn.html -- rank: 1000

... calculate the 2016 adjustment payments in the manner prescribed by N.J.S.A. 5:10A-59(a); and the Authority did not err by including a ... for recalculation of the 2016 adjustment payments in accordance with N.J.S.A. 5:10A-59(a). 1 East Rutherford also was granted leave to intervene ... paid the designated amounts to the municipalities, as required by N.J.S.A. 5:10A-59(b). None of the constituent municipalities filed an appeal challenging ... payments for the three prior calendar years, as required by N.J.S.A. 5:10A-59(a). Ridgefield challenges the 2015 adjustment payments for the same ... payments for 2013, 2014, and 2015, as expressly required by N.J.S.A. 5:10A-59(a). The scope of our review in an appeal from ... the municipalities challenge the Authority's interpretation and application of N.J.S.A. 5:10A-59(a). When the court interprets statutory language, 'the goal ...

docket:
court:	NJ Superior Court Law/Chancery Division
decided:
status:
citation:
Document Size:	26268