Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Thisopinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R.1:36-3 IN THE MATTER OF RIH ACQUIS -- rank: 1000

... 5:12-1 to -233 ("the Act"). The issue involves N.J.S.A. 5:12-140, a provision that authorizes the State to collect from casinos ... in use in any licensed casino establishment in this State." N.J.S.A. 5:12-140(a). The fee provision in its entirety reads as follows ... maintained for use or placed in use after July 1 . [ N.J.S.A. 5:12-140(a) and (b) (emphasis added).] The dispute here largely revolves ... stating in an April 1, 2015 letter of decision that N.J.S.A. 5:12-140(b) only provides for pro rata adjustments of the annual ... 1 RANJ now appeals. It contends that subsection (b) of N.J.S.A. 5:12-140 should be read reciprocally, so as to allow not only ... arguments, we are persuaded that the agency's interpretation of N.J.S.A. 5:12-140 to authorize only pro rata fee increases, and not ...

docket:	a4144-14
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2017-02-02
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	24480