Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 Daniel Angland v. Mountain Creek Resort, Inc. -- rank: 1000

... A. 5:13-4, and the risks that they assume, N.J.S.A. 5:13-5, for which the operator will not be liable, N.J ... of skiing that each skier is deemed to have assumed. N.J.S.A. 5:13-5 (providing that “skier is deemed to have knowledge of ... inherent risks of skiers that are assumed by the skier, N.J.S.A. 5:13-5, and that therefore cannot be the basis for a claim ...

docket:	A-57-11
court:	NJ Supreme Court
decided:	2013-06-06
status:
citation:
Document Size:	79980

2 ADEBISI OJE v. MOUNTAIN CREEK RESORT INC. -- rank: 980

... posted, written or oral instructions prior to using such device. N.J.S.A. 5:13-5, which addresses assumption of risk on the part of the ... contribute to the injury of himself[, herself,] or others. Thus, ' N.J.S.A. 5:13-5 emphasizes that skiers are only deemed to assume those risks ... would be patently inconsistent with the express language contained in N.J.S.A. 5:13-5 and [N.J.S.A. 5:13-1(b)]. These ... inexperience. See N.J.S.A. 5:13-4(d); N.J.S.A. 5:13-5. Even when a skier is charged with the duty to ...

docket:	a1077-21
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2023-07-10
status:	Unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	66959

3 MANUEL AND DINA CALHANAS V. SOUTH AMBOY ROLLER RINK -- rank: 880

... risk provision does not use the term "incidental contact." See N.J.S.A. 5:13-5. Of the seven other states which have roller-rink liability ... have knowledge of and assume "the inherent risks of skiing...." N.J.S.A. 5:13-5 (emphasis added). We believe that a similar standard was enunciated ...

docket:	a1882-95
court:	njappellate
decided:	1996-07-24
status:	published published
citation:	292 N.J.Super. 513
Document Size:	39815

4 ANDREW HOJNOWSKI, et al. v. VANS SKATE PARK -- rank: 847

... risks of skiing, sledding, tobogganing and using other similar vehicles, N.J.S.A. 5:13-5, roller skating, See footnote 21 and equestrian sports, N.J ...

docket:	A2028-03
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2005-03-10
status:	published
citation:	375 N.J. Super. 568 868 A.2d 108
Document Size:	124910

5 Brett v. Great American Recreation, Inc. -- rank: 744

... H. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 225-A:1 to -A:26; N.J.S.A. 5:13-5 is captioned "Assumption of risk of skier":          A skier is ...

docket:	a-51-95
court:	njsupreme
decided:	1996-06-13
status:
citation:	144 N.J. 479
Document Size:	59421

6 DANIEL ANGLAND v. MOUNTAIN CREEK RESORT INC -- rank: 644

... another person or with an object. [ Ibid. (emphasis added).] Moreover, N.J.S.A. 5:13-5 provides: Assumption of risk of skier A skier is deemed ...

docket:	a3100-10
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2011-10-07
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	21805

7 MARK NEUSTADTER et al. v. MOUNTAIN CREEK RESORT, INC. -- rank: 570

... statute states that a skier's assumption of risk under N.J.S.A. 5:13-5 bars recovery for injuries sustained due to "the inherent risks ...

docket:	a5671-05
court:	njappellate
decided:	2008-02-15
status:	unpublished
citation:	*CITE_PENDING*
Document Size:	37717

8 KATHLEEN BROUGH, ET AL, VS HIDDEN VALLEY, INC. -- rank: 540

... r]emove as soon as practicable obvious, man-made hazards." N.J.S.A. 5:13-5. And see 144 N.J. 479 , 499 (1996). Accord Reisman ...

docket:	a3796-96
court:	njappellate
decided:	1998-06-05
status:	published
citation:	312 N.J.Super. 139
Document Size:	39401