Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions

1 In re: ACPE Opinion 705 -- rank: 1000

... 11(c), his firm was also required to comply with N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17, which provides that no former State employee may represent, “whether ... 1.11 should prevail over the more restrictive mandates of N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 serves a legitimate governmental purpose and does not improperly encroach ... especially at the expense of the public. As mentioned above, N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 provides that no former State employee may represent, “whether by ... with as a State employee. The Act defines “interest” broadly. N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 to be an improper infringement of the Judiciary’s interests ... of comity, the Court holds that the restrictions imposed by N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 on all former State employees are equally applicable to attorneys ... the Committee to draft a proposed rule in harmony with N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17. (pp. 14-16)     The ruling of the ACPE is ...

docket:	a-74-06
court:	njsupreme
decided:	2007-07-19
status:
citation:	192 N.J. 46
Document Size:	54498

2 CHARLES J. KRATOVIL, v. MARK A. ANGELSON -- rank: 688

... were covered. N.J.S.A. 52:13D-13(e); N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17.2. That verbiage was not in the NJFA, suggesting that ...

docket:	L-1254-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2020-08-03
status:
citation:
Document Size:	115122

3 JILL CADRE v. PROASSURANCE CASUALTY COMPANY, -- rank: 601

... demonstrates the flexibility of these concepts. There, the Legislature enacted N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17, which 'impute[d] the conflict of interest of a former ... Knight, 86 N.J. at 391). The Court concluded: because N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 serves a legitimate governmental purpose and because its encroachment on ... State must comply with the post- employment strictures of both N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 and RPC 1.11. [Id. at 58.] Here, the insurance ...

docket:	a4969-18
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2021-06-09
status:	Published
citation:
Document Size:	60787

4 PATOCK CONSTRUCTION CO v. NEW JERSEY SCHOOLS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY -- rank: 568

... Project Architect, pursuant to the New Jersey Uniform Ethics Code, N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 (the Code), and the Authority's Design-Build Conflict of ... signed contracts, submitted reports, or approved applications while employed. See N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 app. § H-3 (2011) ("In considering whether a former ... under the Code. Authority employees are subject to the Code, N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17, which provides, in pertinent part: No former State employee shall ...

docket:	a1305-13
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33422

5 IN THE MATTER OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE INVESTIGATION NO. I-07-916 -- rank: 568

... error. As a former State employee, Prezioso is governed by N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 and R.P.C. 1.11. Our Supreme Court has held that the restrictions imposed by N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 apply to attorneys formerly employed by the State and "need ... the Court's consideration, a proposed rule in harmony with N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17." Id. at 58. N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 is more restrictive than R.P.C. 1.11. The ...

docket:	A2711-07
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2008-02-08
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	30998

6 PATOCK CONSTRUCTION CO v. NEW JERSEY SCHOOLS DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY -- rank: 568

... Project Architect, pursuant to the New Jersey Uniform Ethics Code, N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 (the Code), and the Authority's Design-Build Conflict of ... signed contracts, submitted reports, or approved applications while employed. See N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 app. § H-3 (2011) ("In considering whether a former ... under the Code. Authority employees are subject to the Code, N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17, which provides, in pertinent part: No former State employee shall ...

docket:	a1399-13xx
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-01-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	33430

7 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES HABEL -- rank: 497

... of defendant. We reject defendant's contention that Honecker violated N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 and was hence disqualified from representing defendant. Even if Honecker ... any time during the course of his office or employment.' N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17 (emphasis added). Likewise, the proofs do not establish he had ...

docket:	a1473-15
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2018-04-10
status:	unpublished
citation:
Document Size:	107619

8 STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. JAMES BUCKNER -- rank: 470

... bound by the ethical restrictions on judges set forth in N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17; and must comply with all of the provisions of the ...

docket:	a0630-12
court:	NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided:	2014-05-05
status:	published
citation:	437 N.J.Super. 8 96 A.3d 261
Document Size:	151235

9 COUNTY OF WARREN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 359

... J. at 570, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17.2, which banned immediate family of State officials who resided ...

docket:	a4591-07
court:	superior court appellate division
decided:	2009-09-04
status:	published
citation:	409 N.J. Super. 495 978 A.2d 312
Document Size:	80457