Swish-e home page Search Rutgers Law Library N.J. Court Opinions


Limit search to:
Sort by:
Limit to:
    through    
 Results for ("N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29")   1 to 15 of 24 results. Run time: 0.844 seconds | Search time: 0.837 seconds    
 Page:1 2 Next 9
1 Borough of East Rutherford v. East Rutherford -- rank: 1000
... family for in-network services for each calendar year.” N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(C). PERC denied the Borough’s request to restrain arbitration ... the Arbitrator’s award, concluding that it was contrary to N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(C), violated public policy, exceeded the Arbitrator’s authority, was ... c. 103, § 23 (effective June 27, 2007) (codified at N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(C)).] The Sponsors’ Statements explained that the amendments “reflect ... The trial court held that the award was contrary to N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(C), violated public policy, exceeded the Arbitrator’s authority, was ... that the award be vacated. In addition to relying on N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(C), the trial court’s reasoning focused on N.J ... 52:14-17.36 (addressing employer participation in SHBP) and N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29 (identifying those benefits that employer participating in SHBP shall ...
docket: A-24-11
court: NJ Supreme Court
decided: 2012-03-19
status:
citation: 213 N.J. 190 61 A.3d 941
Document Size: 110389
2 ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICERS PBA LOCAL 183 and ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR OFFICERS FOR LODGE 106 v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DIVISION OF PENSIONS AND BENEFITS -- rank: 852
... all plans offered.'). C. SHBP Contract Procurement and Coverage Terms N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29 mandates the types of coverage the SHB Commission must provide ... several subsections discussing the administration of contract coverages. For example, N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(A)(1)-(2) details the required coverage for 'basic benefits ... those stipulated in the contracts held by the [SHB Commission]. [ N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(D) (emphasis added).] Subsection (J), the last portion of N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29, was included in the Chapter 78 amendments enacted in 2011 ... other such participant costs for all plans in the program. [ N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(J) (emphasis added).] A-1228-17T2 15 See also Teamsters ... ultra vires. To support this position, the Unions cite to N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(J), which provides: 'the [Plan Design Committee] shall have ...
docket: a1228-17
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2019-06-14
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 48985
3 COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION -- rank: 810
... inequity, unnecessary utilization, duplication of services or benefits otherwise available . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(D).] The Act further provides that any contract for basic ... the State. [ N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28a.] N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29 sets forth the benefits to be included in the SHBP ... or benefits to employees not included in collective negotiations units. [ N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(H).] The purpose of the SHBP and the express terms ... purchase a contract or contracts to provide drug prescription benefits. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(H). As with other health benefit coverage, the SHBC has ... limitations and exclusions of coverage and to modify the coverage, N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(B), except that the benefits provided must be equal to ...
docket: a2767-05
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-08-01
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 44975
4 COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION -- rank: 810
... inequity, unnecessary utilization, duplication of services or benefits otherwise available . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(D).] The Act further provides that any contract for basic ... the State. [ N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28a.] N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29 sets forth the benefits to be included in the SHBP ... or benefits to employees not included in collective negotiations units. [ N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(H).] The purpose of the SHBP and the express terms ... purchase a contract or contracts to provide drug prescription benefits. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(H). As with other health benefit coverage, the SHBC has ... limitations and exclusions of coverage and to modify the coverage, N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(B), except that the benefits provided must be equal to ...
docket: a2803-05
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-08-01
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 44975
5 COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION -- rank: 810
... inequity, unnecessary utilization, duplication of services or benefits otherwise available . . . . [ N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(D).] The Act further provides that any contract for basic ... the State. [ N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.28a.] N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29 sets forth the benefits to be included in the SHBP ... or benefits to employees not included in collective negotiations units. [ N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(H).] The purpose of the SHBP and the express terms ... purchase a contract or contracts to provide drug prescription benefits. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(H). As with other health benefit coverage, the SHBC has ... limitations and exclusions of coverage and to modify the coverage, N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(B), except that the benefits provided must be equal to ...
docket: a0962-06
court: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2008-08-01
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 44974
6 PATERSON POLICE PBA LOCAL NO. 1 v. CITY OF PATERSON -- rank: 786
... or for other reasons' that the SHB Commission deems necessary. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(D). 'No benefits shall be provided beyond those stipulated in ...
docket: a3937-19
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2021-04-19
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 68496
7 BOROUGH OF EAST RUTHERFORD v. EAST RUTHERFORD PBA LOCAL 275 -- rank: 781
... State Health Benefits Plan (SHBP), effective January 1, 2007. See N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(C). We reverse. I. The PBA entered into a collective ... the Borough's argument that the matter was preempted by N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(C), the provision increasing member co-pays for doctor visits ... laws." The judge determined that that provision, when read with N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(C) governing co-payments for visits to the doctor, barred ... C. 17:9-1.4 likewise required such uniformity. Because N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(C) required co-payments of ten dollars, the "arbitration award ... undermining the SHBC's determination, embodied in the amendment to N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(C), to uniformly increase co-payments for doctor visits and ... the policy of uniformity in connection with the implementation of N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(C). As a consequence, we reverse the judge's ...
docket: a5310-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-03-22
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 30648
8 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 97 v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 710
... to the committee. Section 47 (codified in relevant part at N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(J)) provides that "[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law ...
docket: a4086-10xx
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-02-27
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 101434
9 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 97 v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 710
... to the committee. Section 47 (codified in relevant part at N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(J)) provides that "[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law ...
docket: a3916-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-01-31
status: published
citation: 434 N.J.Super. 393 84 A.3d 989
Document Size: 101618
10 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 97 v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 710
... to the committee. Section 47 (codified in relevant part at N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(J)) provides that "[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law ...
docket: a3274-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-01-31
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 101452
11 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 97 v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 710
... to the committee. Section 47 (codified in relevant part at N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(J)) provides that "[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law ...
docket: a3868-10
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2014-01-31
status: published
citation:
Document Size: 101451
12 PRINCETON NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, P.C v. HORIZON BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NEW JERSEY -- rank: 600
... exclude benefits.' Beaver, 433 N.J. Super. at 433 (citing N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(B)). The Act empowers the Commission to create 'rules and ...
docket: a0486-22
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2024-01-17
status: Unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 34551
13 STEVEN SARGESE v. HORIZON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC -- rank: 585
... which shall be excluded from or limited under such coverage." N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(A)(2). The Commission is authorized to impose limitations and ... beyond those stipulated in the contracts held by the [Commission]." N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(D). The Commission contracted with Horizon to administer the SHBP ... uniquely suited to resolve the issue presented by plaintiffs. See N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(A)(2) ("[T]he commission may, by regulation, determine what ...
docket: a3954-11
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2013-06-11
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 36797
14 JAYNEE LaVECCHIA v. STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION -- rank: 523
... to purchase contracts that are subject to limitations and exclusions. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29 (D). Additionally, the SHBC is statutorily prohibited from providing coverage ...
docket: a4753-08
court: superior court appellate division
decided: 2010-08-10
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 120014
15 EMANUEL GOLDMAN v. STATE HEALTH BENEFITS COMMISSION -- rank: 517
... Commission with the authority to administer and regulate the SHBP. N.J.S.A. 52:14-17.29(D) governs the manner in which the SHBP provides health ...
docket: a3865-09
court: NJ Superior Court Appellate Division
decided: 2011-05-05
status: unpublished
citation:
Document Size: 23594
 Page:1 2 Next 9
Powered by Swish-e swish-e.org

Valid HTML 4.01!